First-trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high-risk women: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: The primary aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether ultrasound signs suggestive of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) are present in the first trimester of pregnancy. Secondary aims were to ascertain the strength of association and the predictive accuracy of such signs in detecting AIP in the first trimester. Methods: An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases (2000–2016) was performed. Only studies reporting on first‐trimester diagnosis of AIP that was subsequently confirmed in the third trimester either during operative delivery or by pathological examination were included. Meta‐analysis of proportions, random‐effects meta‐analysis and hierarchical summary receiver–operating characteristics curve analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: Seven studies, involving 551 pregnancies at high risk of AIP, were included. At least one ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP was detected in 91.4% (95% CI, 85.8–95.7%) of cases with confirmed AIP. The most common ultrasound feature in the first trimester of pregnancy was low implantation of the gestational sac close to a previous uterine scar, which was observed in 82.4% (95% CI, 46.6–99.8%) of cases. Anechoic spaces within the placental mass (lacunae) were observed in 46.0% (95% CI, 10.9–83.7%) and a reduced myometrial thickness in 66.8% (95% CI, 45.2–85.2%) of cases affected by AIP. Pregnancies with a low implantation of the gestational sac had a significantly higher risk of AIP (odds ratio, 19.6 (95% CI, 6.7–57.3)), with a sensitivity and specificity of 44.4% (95% CI, 21.5–69.2%) and 93.4% (95% CI, 90.5–95.7%), respectively. Conclusions: Ultrasound signs of AIP can be present during the first trimester of pregnancy, even before 11 weeks' gestation. Low anterior implantation of the placenta/gestational sac close to or within the scar was the most commonly seen early ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP, although its individual predictive accuracy was not high. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low implantation of the gestational sac presented with an almost 20-times higher risk of abnormally invasive placenta (OR: 19.6; 95% CI: 6.7-57.3).
“Furthermore, low implantation of the gestational sac presented with an almost 20-times higher risk of abnormally invasive placenta (OR: 19.6; 95% CI: 6.7–57.3) [62].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [62]
Cites
The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance
Glas, A. S., Lijmer, J. G., Prins, M. H., Bonsel, G. J., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x · Cited by 2,261 · see citing works
Hunter, J. P., Saratzis, A., Sutton, A. J., Boucher, R. H., Sayers, R. D., & Bown, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.003 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Shamshirsaz, A. A., Fox, K. A., Salmanian, B., Diaz-Arrastia, C. R., Lee, W., Baker, B. W., Ballas, J., Chen, Q., Van Veen, T. R., Javadian, P., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.019 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
metandi: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression
Harbord, R. M., & Whiting, P. (2009) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0900900203 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
D'Antonio, F., Iacovella, C., & Bhide, A. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.13194 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Self-citationD'Antonio, F., Iacovella, C., Palacios-Jaraquemada, J., Bruno, C. H., Manzoli, L., & Bhide, A. (2014) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.13327 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Self-citationCesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Monteagudo, A., Cali, G., Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J. M., Maymon, R., Arslan, A. A., Patil, N., Popiolek, D., & Mittal, K. R. (2014) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.13282 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Self-citationShamshirsaz, A. A., Fox, K. A., Erfani, H., Clark, S. L., Salmanian, B., Baker, B. W., Coburn, M., Shamshirsaz, A. A., Bateni, Z. H., Espinoza, J., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.016 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maternal morbidity and mortality due to placenta accreta spectrum disorders
Fonseca, A., & Ayres de Campos, D. (2021) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.07.011 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Tinari, S., Buca, D., Cali, G., Timor‐Tritsch, I., Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J., Rizzo, G., Lucidi, A., Di Mascio, D., Liberati, M., & D'Antonio, F. (2021) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.22183 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationFirst-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- D'Antonio, F., Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J., Monteagudo, A., Buca, D., Forlani, F., Minneci, G., Foti, F., Manzoli, L., Liberati, M., Acharya, G., & Calì, G.
- Affiliations
- Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences UiT‐The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø Norway
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Centre for Medical Education and Clinical Research (CEMIC) University Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Arnas Civico Hospital Palermo Italy
- University of Ferrara (IT)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 176-183
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2749158169
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- abnormally invasive placenta, first-trimester ultrasound, previous uterine scar, placental lacunae, high-risk pregnancy, prediction accuracy, placenta accreta spectrum, preterm birth, preoperative diagnosis, instrumental delivery, pathological examination, sensitivity and specificity, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Myometrium, Placenta, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review