Cited by 116Maternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

First-trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high-risk women: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
D'Antonio, F., Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J., Monteagudo, A., Buca, D., Forlani, F., Minneci, G., Foti, F. +4 more·2018·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: The primary aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether ultrasound signs suggestive of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) are present in the first trimester of pregnancy. Secondary aims were to ascertain the strength of association and the predictive accuracy of such signs in detecting AIP in the first trimester. Methods: An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases (2000–2016) was performed. Only studies reporting on first‐trimester diagnosis of AIP that was subsequently confirmed in the third trimester either during operative delivery or by pathological examination were included. Meta‐analysis of proportions, random‐effects meta‐analysis and hierarchical summary receiver–operating characteristics curve analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: Seven studies, involving 551 pregnancies at high risk of AIP, were included. At least one ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP was detected in 91.4% (95% CI, 85.8–95.7%) of cases with confirmed AIP. The most common ultrasound feature in the first trimester of pregnancy was low implantation of the gestational sac close to a previous uterine scar, which was observed in 82.4% (95% CI, 46.6–99.8%) of cases. Anechoic spaces within the placental mass (lacunae) were observed in 46.0% (95% CI, 10.9–83.7%) and a reduced myometrial thickness in 66.8% (95% CI, 45.2–85.2%) of cases affected by AIP. Pregnancies with a low implantation of the gestational sac had a significantly higher risk of AIP (odds ratio, 19.6 (95% CI, 6.7–57.3)), with a sensitivity and specificity of 44.4% (95% CI, 21.5–69.2%) and 93.4% (95% CI, 90.5–95.7%), respectively. Conclusions: Ultrasound signs of AIP can be present during the first trimester of pregnancy, even before 11 weeks' gestation. Low anterior implantation of the placenta/gestational sac close to or within the scar was the most commonly seen early ultrasound sign suggestive of AIP, although its individual predictive accuracy was not high. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.18840

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low implantation of the gestational sac presented with an almost 20-times higher risk of abnormally invasive placenta (OR: 19.6; 95% CI: 6.7-57.3).

    “Furthermore, low implantation of the gestational sac presented with an almost 20-times higher risk of abnormally invasive placenta (OR: 19.6; 95% CI: 6.7–57.3) [62].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Antonio, F., Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J., Monteagudo, A., Buca, D., Forlani, F., Minneci, G., Foti, F., Manzoli, L., Liberati, M., Acharya, G., & Calì, G.
Affiliations
  • Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences UiT‐The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø Norway
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Centre for Medical Education and Clinical Research (CEMIC) University Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Arnas Civico Hospital Palermo Italy
  • University of Ferrara (IT)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
176-183
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2749158169
Cited by
116
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
abnormally invasive placenta, first-trimester ultrasound, previous uterine scar, placental lacunae, high-risk pregnancy, prediction accuracy, placenta accreta spectrum, preterm birth, preoperative diagnosis, instrumental delivery, pathological examination, sensitivity and specificity, risk factors
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Myometrium, Placenta, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review