Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11–13 weeks’ gestation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To examine the performance of the routine 11–13‐week scan in detecting fetal non‐chromosomal abnormalities. Methods: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from 100 997 singleton pregnancies attending for a routine ultrasound examination of fetal anatomy, performed according to a standardized protocol, at 11–13 weeks' gestation. All continuing pregnancies had an additional scan at 18–24 weeks and 71 754 had a scan at either 30–34 or 35–37 weeks. The final diagnosis of fetal abnormality was based on the results of postnatal examination in cases of live birth and on the findings of the last ultrasound examination in cases of pregnancy termination, miscarriage or stillbirth. The performance of the 11–13‐week scan in the detection of fetal abnormalities was determined. Results: The study population contained 1720 (1.7%) pregnancies with a fetal abnormality, including 474 (27.6%) detected on the first‐trimester scan, 926 (53.8%) detected on the second‐trimester scan and 320 (18.6%) detected in the third trimester or postnatally. At 11–13 weeks' gestation, we diagnosed all cases of acrania, alobar holoprosencephaly, encephalocele, tricuspid or pulmonary atresia, pentalogy of Cantrell, ectopia cordis, exomphalos, gastroschisis and body‐stalk anomaly and > 50% of cases of open spina bifida, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, atrioventricular septal defect, complex heart defect, left atrial isomerism (interrupted inferior vena cava with normal intracardiac anatomy), lower urinary tract obstruction, absence of extremities, fetal akinesia deformation sequence and lethal skeletal dysplasia. Common abnormalities that were detected in < 10% of cases at 11–13 weeks included ventriculomegaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, isolated cleft lip, congenital pulmonary airway malformation, ventricular septal defect, abdominal cysts, unilateral renal agenesis or multicystic kidney, hydronephrosis, duplex kidney, hypospadias and talipes. Conclusions: A routine 11–13‐week scan, carried out according to a standardized protocol, can identify many severe non‐chromosomal fetal abnormalities. A summary statistic of the performance of the first‐trimester scan is futile because some abnormalities are always detectable, whereas others are either non‐detectable or sometimes detectable. To maximize prenatal detection of abnormalities, additional scans in both the second and third trimesters are necessary. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first-trimester scan is typically performed between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks.
“It is typically performed between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks and serves as a valuable tool for the confirmation of intrauterine pregnancy; evaluation of the presence, location and number of gestational sacs; determination of gestational age; assessment of fetal number, chorionicity and amnionicity; and evaluation of early fetal anatomy [2].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Careful visualization of the skull, midline echo, choroid plexuses, midbrain and brain stem resulted in identification of all cases of acrania, holoprosencephaly, and encephalocele, as well as 59% of open spina bifida cases and 13% of cerebellum abnormalities.
“Moreover, according to a large study, careful visualization of the skull, midline echo, choroid plexuses, midbrain and brain stem resulted in identification of all cases of acrania, holoprosencephaly, and encephalocele, as well as 59% of open spina bifida cases and 13% of cerebellum abnormalities [2].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Lower urinary tract obstruction presents with a much higher detection rate (71.2%) during the first-trimester anatomic scan.
“On the other hand, lower urinary tract obstruction presents with a much higher detection rate (71.2%) during the first-trimester anatomic scan [2].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Only a small number of cases with renal anomalies were detected in the first trimester.
“Results from a large study demonstrated that only a small number of cases with renal anomalies were detected in the first trimester [2].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia
Rolnik, D. L., Wright, D., Poon, L. C., O’Gorman, N., Syngelaki, A., de Paco Matallana, C., Akolekar, R., Cicero, S., Janga, D., Singh, M., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1704559 · Cited by 2,287 · see citing works
Self-citationSnijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572 · see citing works
O’Gorman, N., Wright, D., Syngelaki, A., Akolekar, R., Wright, A., Poon, L. C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.034 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Syngelaki, A., Hammami, A., Bower, S., Zidere, V., Akolekar, R., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Affiliations
- King's College Hospital (GB)
- Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 468-476
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2967939229
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 10 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 35.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fetal Medicine Foundation ((Charity No: 1037116))
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
- Keywords
- first-trimester ultrasound, second-trimester ultrasound, prenatal diagnosis, fetal structural anomalies, congenital heart disease, neural tube defects, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, fetal akinesia deformation sequence, skeletal dysplasia, ventriculomegaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation
- MeSH terms
- Congenital Abnormalities, Adult, Female, Fetus, Gestational Age, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Prenatal Care, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Nuchal Translucency Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review