Absent ‘superimposed-line’ sign: Novel marker in early diagnosis of cleft of fetal secondary palate
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe a novel sign, the 'superimposed-line' sign, for early diagnosis of cleft of the fetal secondary palate on two-dimensional imaging of the vomeromaxillary junction in the midsagittal view. METHODS: This was a prospective evaluation of the superimposed-line sign using two-dimensional sonography (midsagittal view) in 9576 singleton fetuses referred for routine screening between 12 and 20 weeks of gestation. In this view, the vomer bone appears as a line superimposed on the distal two-thirds of the maxillary line, as the vomer fuses with the secondary palate in the midline. If there is a midline cleft of the secondary palate, the line formed by the palate is absent and hence only the vomer bone is visualized, creating a single line instead of the normal superimposed double line. Multiplanar three-dimensional (3D) views were assessed in cases in which the superimposed-line sign was absent. RESULTS: The superimposed line was absent in 17 fetuses with a cleft of the secondary palate that was confirmed by 3D evaluation. Of these, 13 had defects involving the premaxilla and four had an isolated cleft of the secondary palate. Postnatal confirmation was available in all cases. The sign was useful in ruling out cleft of the fetal secondary palate in 32 high-risk cases with a family history of cleft palate. The superimposed-line sign had a sensitivity of 89.5% in detecting cleft of the secondary palate. CONCLUSIONS: The superimposed-line sign is a new sonographic marker for evaluation of cleft of the fetal secondary palate; documentation of this sign proves the presence of both the palate and vomer in the midline. This marker can be demonstrated clearly in the late first trimester, allowing early diagnosis of secondary palatine cleft. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The "superimposed-line" sign showed a sensitivity and specificity of 89.5% and 99.8%, respectively, for detecting orofacial clefts according to a prospective study of almost 10,000 fetuses.
“Furthermore, the “superimposed-line” sign showed a sensitivity and specificity of 89.5% and 99.8%, respectively, for detecting orofacial clefts according to a prospective study of almost 10,000 fetuses [41].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Lakshmy, S. R., Rose, N., Masilamani, P., Umapathy, S., & Ziyaulla, T.
- Affiliations
- Shri Lakshmi Clinic & Scan Centre (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Lakshmy, S. R.
- ORCID
- Lakshmy, S. R.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 906-915
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2991621492
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- cleft palate, prenatal diagnosis, maxillary bone, premaxilla, diagnostic biomarkers, sensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cleft Palate, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Maxilla, Palate, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Early Diagnosis, Vomer, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review