The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate whether engagement of the fetal head or cervical length in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term, are associated with time from PROM to delivery or need for operative delivery. Methods: A transperineal ultrasound examination was performed in 152 women with a single live fetus in cephalic presentation after PROM (at > 37 gestational weeks). The shortest distance from the outer bony limit of the fetal skull to the skin surface of the perineum was measured in a transverse view, and the cervical length was measured in a sagittal view. The time from PROM to delivery was tested in a Cox regression analysis with ultrasound measurements, parity, maternal age, body mass index and birth weight as possible predictive factors. Results: The head‐perineal distance was associated with the time from PROM to delivery (log rank test, P < 0.001). Thirty‐six hours after PROM, 32% (95% CI, 15–49) of women with a short head–perineal distance (< 45 mm) and 43% (95% CI, 24–62) of women with a long distance (≥ 45 mm) were still in labor. Women with a short head–perineal distance had fewer Cesarean sections, less use of epidural analgesia and a shorter time in active labor, and their babies had a higher pH in the umbilical artery. The measured cervical length was not associated independently with time to delivery. Conclusion: Transperineal ultrasound measurements of fetal head engagement may help clinicians to predict the course of labor in women with PROM. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound
Ghi, T., Eggebø, T., Lees, C., Kalache, K., Rozenberg, P., Youssef, A., Salomon, L. J., & Tutschek, B. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19072 · Cited by 348
Self-citationKalache, K. D., Dückelmann, A. M., Michaelis, S. A. M., Lange, J., Cichon, G., & Dudenhausen, J. W. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6294 · Cited by 262
Ghi, T., Conversano, F., Ramirez Zegarra, R., Pisani, P., Dall'Asta, A., Lanzone, A., Lau, W., Vimercati, A., Iliescu, D. G., Mappa, I., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23739 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Eggebø, T. M., Gjessing, L. K., Heien, C., Smedvig, E., Økland, I., Romundstad, P., & Salvesen, K. Å.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-24
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-391
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2050121182
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.2744
- The paper
- Eggebø, T. M., Gjessing, L. K., Heien, C., Smedvig, E., Økland, I., Romundstad, P., & Salvesen, K. Å. (2006). Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.