Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term

Open access
Eggebø, T. M., Gjessing, L. K., Heien, C., Smedvig, E., Økland, I., Romundstad, P., Salvesen, K. Å.·2006·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether engagement of the fetal head or cervical length in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term, are associated with time from PROM to delivery or need for operative delivery. Methods: A transperineal ultrasound examination was performed in 152 women with a single live fetus in cephalic presentation after PROM (at > 37 gestational weeks). The shortest distance from the outer bony limit of the fetal skull to the skin surface of the perineum was measured in a transverse view, and the cervical length was measured in a sagittal view. The time from PROM to delivery was tested in a Cox regression analysis with ultrasound measurements, parity, maternal age, body mass index and birth weight as possible predictive factors. Results: The head‐perineal distance was associated with the time from PROM to delivery (log rank test, P < 0.001). Thirty‐six hours after PROM, 32% (95% CI, 15–49) of women with a short head–perineal distance (< 45 mm) and 43% (95% CI, 24–62) of women with a long distance (≥ 45 mm) were still in labor. Women with a short head–perineal distance had fewer Cesarean sections, less use of epidural analgesia and a shorter time in active labor, and their babies had a higher pH in the umbilical artery. The measured cervical length was not associated independently with time to delivery. Conclusion: Transperineal ultrasound measurements of fetal head engagement may help clinicians to predict the course of labor in women with PROM. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.2744

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Eggebø, T. M., Gjessing, L. K., Heien, C., Smedvig, E., Økland, I., Romundstad, P., & Salvesen, K. Å.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-24
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
387-391
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2050121182
Cited by
209
References
0
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.2744
The paper
Eggebø, T. M., Gjessing, L. K., Heien, C., Smedvig, E., Økland, I., Romundstad, P., & Salvesen, K. Å. (2006). Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2744

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.