Cited by 21Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Computer‐aided diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence with vector‐based perineal ultrasound using neural networks

Open access
Huang, Y.‐L., Chen, H.‐Y.·2007·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: Adequately defining the anatomical and functional defects in women with stress urinary incontinence prior to surgical repair is essential. Differences in dynamic changes of the bladder neck on perineal ultrasound have been shown to be effective in differentiating between women with and those without urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). This study evaluated a system to diagnose USI with computer‐aided vector‐based perineal ultrasound. Methods: We evaluated 48 women with lower urinary tract symptoms, of whom 36 were found to have USI, by urodynamic study and computer‐aided vector‐based perineal ultrasound. The function and morphology of the lower urinary tract were used as features in a multilayer perception (MLP) neural network classifier to distinguish between women with and those without USI. The k‐fold cross‐validation method was used to estimate the performance of the proposed computer‐aided diagnosis (CAD) system. Results: The accuracy of the proposed CAD system for classifying USI was 91.7% (44/48), the sensitivity was 94.4% (34/36), the specificity was 83.3% (10/12), the positive predictive value was 94.4% (34/36) and the negative predictive value was 83.3% (10/12). The receiver–operating characteristics area index for the proposed CAD system was 0.941 ± 0.034. The proposed CAD system differentiated USI effectively with perineal ultrasound. Conclusion: Computer‐aided vector‐based perineal ultrasound is valuable in assessing anatomical changes of the bladder neck. Women with and those without USI can be distinguished using perineal sonographic analysis with the proposed CAD system. Because the MLP model is trainable, it could be optimized if a larger set of perineal ultrasound images and other useful features were supplied. Copyright © 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.4102

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several original studies published in this Journal have used AI methodology to evaluate adnexal masses, risk of lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer, pelvic organ function, breast lesions, aneuploidy risk, fetal lung maturity, perinatal outcome, shoulder dystocia, brain damage, gestational age in late pregnancy, and classify standard fetal brain images as normal or abnormal.

    “Several original studies published in this Journal have used AI methodology to evaluate adnexal masses 21 , the risk of lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer 22 , pelvic organ function 23 , 24 and breast lesions 25 , 26 , 27 , assess aneuploidy risk 28 , predict fetal lung maturity 29 , perinatal outcome 30 , shoulder dystocia 31 and brain damage 32 , estimate gestational age in late pregnan”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning represen- tation by back-propagation errors. Nature 1986; 323: 533-536.
  2. Soligo M, Khullar V, Salvatore S, Luppino G, Arcari V, Milani R. Overactive bladder definition and ultrasound mea- surement of bladder wall thickness: The right way without urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 284-285.
  3. Copyright  2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 1002-1006. 14690705, 2007, 7, Downloaded from https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.4102 by Test, Wiley Online Library on [16/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI

Authors
Huang, Y. ‐., & Chen, H. ‐.
Affiliations
  • Tunghai University (TW)
  • China Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, Y.‐L.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-18
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
1002-1006
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2069341666
Cited by
21
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
stress urinary incontinence, computer-aided diagnosis, bladder neck, multilayer perceptron, urodynamic stress incontinence, lower urinary tract symptoms, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Urinary Bladder, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Perineum, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Urodynamics, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review