The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20–74 years
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of endometrial polyps and to investigate associated abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20–74 years. Methods: This was a study of a random selection of women from the Danish Civil Registration System: 1660 women were invited of whom 686 were included (429 pre‐ and 257 postmenopausal). AUB was assessed by a validated questionnaire. The women underwent transvaginal sonography (TVS) and saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH). Hysteroscopic resection was performed in cases with suspected focal intrauterine pathology. Full evaluation was performed in 619 women (two failures of TVS and 60 failures of SCSH, in two women SCSH was contraindicated (endometrial cancer), in two women hysteroscopy was contraindicated, and one polyp was lost before histology). World Health Organization histopathological criteria were used for diagnosing true endometrial polyps. Results: On final diagnosis there were 48 women with polyps, eight with submucosal myomas, four with other benign findings and one with polypoidal growing endometrial cancer. Complex hyperplasia without atypia was diagnosed in two women with polyps. The prevalence of endometrial polyps was 7.8% (48/619; 95% CI, 5.6–9.9%). The prevalence was influenced significantly by age (P < 0.005); in women below the age of 30 years, the prevalence was 0.9%. Polyps were diagnosed in 5.8% of pre‐ and 11.8% of postmenopausal women (P < 0.01). Thirty‐nine (82%) of the women who had histopathologically verified polyps were asymptomatic. In asymptomatic premenopausal women the prevalence of polyps was 7.6%, while it was 13% in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. AUB, in particular intermenstrual bleeding, was more frequent among women without polyps (38%). By ultrasound examination, submucosal myomas were diagnosed in 4.2% (26/622; 95% CI, 2.6–5.8%) and intramural myomas in 11.1% (76/684; 95% CI, 8.8–13.5%) of women. Polyps were diagnosed in 2% of oral‐contraceptive and 25% of hormone‐therapy users. Conclusions: The overall prevalence of endometrial polyps was 7.8% and the prevalence increased with age. Polyps were rare (0.9%) in women below the age of 30 years. Surprisingly, AUB was less frequent among women with polyps than among those without polyps. Copyright © 2008 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood
Schmidt, L., Sobotka, T., Bentzen, J. G., Nyboe Andersen, A., & on behalf of the ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr040 · Cited by 656
(2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002631 · Cited by 264
The Oncogenic Potential of Endometrial Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lee, S. C., Kaunitz, A. M., Sanchez-Ramos, L., & Rhatigan, R. M. (2010) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181f74864 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Dreisler, E., Stampe Sorensen, S., Ibsen, P. H., & Lose, G.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-29
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-108
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W4230036251
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20–74 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.6259
- The paper
- Dreisler, E., Stampe Sorensen, S., Ibsen, P. H., & Lose, G. (2009). Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20–74 years. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.