Fetal nasal bone in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11–13 weeks of gestation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To investigate the performance of first‐trimester screening for aneuploidies by including assessment of the fetal nasal bone in the combined test of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency (NT) thickness, fetal heart rate (FHR) and serum free β‐human chorionic gonadotropin (β‐hCG) and pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐A (PAPP‐A). Methods: Screening by the combined test was performed in singleton pregnancies, including 19 614 with euploid fetuses, 122 with trisomy 21, 36 with trisomy 18, 20 with trisomy 13 and eight with Turner syndrome. In all cases the fetal nasal bone was assessed and classified as present or absent. We examined the performance of two screening strategies: firstly, assessment of the nasal bone in all patients and secondly, first‐stage screening using the combined test in all patients followed by second‐stage assessment of the nasal bone only in those with an intermediate risk of 1 in 51 to 1 in 1000 after the first stage. To validate the new risk algorithm we used a second independent dataset of 19 651 fetuses, including 139 with trisomy 21. Results: The nasal bone was absent in 2.6% of the euploid fetuses, 59.8% with trisomy 21, 52.8% with trisomy 18, 45.0% with trisomy 13 and in none of the fetuses with Turner syndrome. Respective figures for an absent nasal bone in the validation population, which contained fewer Black women, were 0.6%, 62.6%, 55.3%, 35.3% and 41.7%. In a screening policy based on maternal age, fetal NT, FHR, serum free β‐hCG and PAPP‐A, for a fixed risk cut‐off of 1 : 100, the false‐positive rate was 3.0%. The standardized detection rates were 91% for trisomy 21 and 100% for trisomy 18, trisomy 13 and Turner syndrome, respectively. Assessment of the nasal bone in all pregnancies reduced the false‐positive rate to 2.5% without changing the detection rate. A detection rate of 93% was achieved with the two‐stage strategy at a false‐positive rate of 2.4% in which it was necessary to assess the nasal bone in only 15% of the total population. In the validation dataset, screening by the combined test and using a risk cut‐off of 1 : 100 detected 90% of the cases with trisomy 21 for a false‐positive rate of 4%. Inclusion of the nasal bone increased the detection rate to 92% for a false‐positive rate of 2.9%. Contingent screening detected 92% of cases for a false‐positive rate of 2.9%. Conclusions: Assessment of the fetal nasal bone improves the performance of first‐trimester screening for trisomy 21. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inclusion of the nasal bone in first-trimester protocols for major chromosomal defects screening led to an overall detection rate of 92% with a false-positive rate of 2.9%.
“Subsequently, the nasal bone should be evaluated on the midsagittal view of the fetal head, as its inclusion in first-trimester protocols for major chromosomal defects screening led to an overall detection rate of 92% with a false-positive rate of 2.9% [44].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
The detection rate increased to 91% when nasal bone examination was combined with the above-mentioned screening protocol.
“while the detection rate increased to 91% when combined with the above-mentioned screening protocol [44].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
Absent or hypoplastic nasal bone was associated with trisomy 21 in almost 60% of cases.
“Its examination is justified based on a large-scale study which showed that absent or hypoplastic nasal bone was associated with trisomy 21 in almost 60% of cases”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 172
- Authors
- Kagan, K. O., Cicero, S., Staboulidou, I., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Affiliations
- Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine (GB)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-26
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-264
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2126460983
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- fetal nasal bone, first-trimester screening, Down syndrome, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, Turner syndrome, aneuploidy, nuchal translucency, combined screening, risk algorithm, false positive rate, detection rate, Black women, maternal age, fetal heart rate, beta-hCG, PAPP-A
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Chromosomes, Human, 13-15, Chromosomes, Human, 16-18, Down Syndrome, Female, Heart Rate, Fetal, Humans, Maternal Age, Middle Aged, Nasal Bone, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A, Prospective Studies, Trisomy, Turner Syndrome, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Risk Assessment, Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human, Nuchal Translucency Measurement, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review