Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Severe diaphragmatic hernia treated by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion

Open access
Jani, J. C., Nicolaides, K. H., Gratacós, E., Valencia, C. M., Doné, E., Martinez, J.‐M., Gucciardo, L., Cruz, R., Deprest, J. A.·2009·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To examine operative and perinatal aspects of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Methods: This was a multicenter study of singleton pregnancies with CDH treated by FETO. The entry criteria for FETO were severe CDH on the basis of sonographic evidence of intrathoracic herniation of the liver and low lung area to head circumference ratio (LHR) defined as the observed to the expected normal mean for gestation (o/e LHR) equivalent to an LHR of 1 or less. Results: FETO was carried out in 210 cases, including 175 cases with left‐sided, 34 right‐sided and one with bilateral CDH. In 188 cases the CDH was isolated and in 22 there was an associated defect. FETO was performed at a median gestational age of 27.1 (range, 23.0–33.3) weeks. The first eight cases were done under general anesthesia, but subsequently either regional or local anesthesia was used. The median duration of FETO was 10 (range, 3–93) min. Successful placement of the balloon at the first procedure was achieved in 203 (96.7%) cases. Spontaneous preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurred in 99 (47.1%) cases at 3–83 (median, 30) days after FETO and within 3 weeks of the procedure in 35 (16.7%) cases. Removal of the balloon was prenatal either by fetoscopy or ultrasound‐guided puncture, intrapartum by ex‐utero intrapartum treatment, or postnatal either by tracheoscopy or percutaneous puncture. Delivery was at 25.7–41.0 (median, 35.3) weeks and before 34 weeks in 65 (30.9%) cases. In 204 (97.1%) cases the babies were live born and 98 (48.0%) were discharged from the hospital alive. There were 10 deaths directly related to difficulties with removal of the balloon. Significant prediction of survival was provided by the o/e LHR and gestational age at delivery. On the basis of the relationship between survival and o/e LHR in expectantly managed fetuses with CDH, as reported in the antenatal CDH registry, we estimated that in fetuses with left CDH treated with FETO the survival rate increased from 24.1% to 49.1%, and in right CDH survival increased from 0% to 35.3% (P < 0.001). Conclusions: FETO in severe CDH is associated with a high incidence of PPROM and preterm delivery but a substantial improvement in survival. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.6450

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Jani, J. C., Nicolaides, K. H., Gratacós, E., Valencia, C. M., Doné, E., Martinez, J. ‐., Gucciardo, L., Cruz, R., & Deprest, J. A.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-05
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
304-310
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2112046432
Cited by
424
References
0
FWCI
34.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe diaphragmatic hernia treated by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.6450
The paper
Jani, J. C., Nicolaides, K. H., Gratacós, E., Valencia, C. M., Doné, E., Martinez, J. ‐., Gucciardo, L., Cruz, R., & Deprest, J. A. (2009). Severe diaphragmatic hernia treated by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6450

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.