Cited by 321Spinal Dysraphism and MalformationsPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Assessment of intracranial translucency (IT) in the detection of spina bifida at the 11–13-week scan

Chaoui, R., Benoit, B., Mitkowska‐Wozniak, H., Heling, K. S., Nicolaides, K. H.·2009·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal diagnosis of open spina bifida is carried out by ultrasound examination in the second trimester of pregnancy. The diagnosis is suspected by the presence of a 'lemon-shaped' head and a 'banana-shaped' cerebellum, thought to be consequences of caudal displacement of the hindbrain. The aim of the study was to determine whether in fetuses with spina bifida this displacement of the brain is evident from the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: In women undergoing routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation as part of screening for chromosomal abnormalities, a mid-sagittal view of the fetal face was obtained to measure nuchal translucency thickness and assess the nasal bone. In this view the fourth ventricle, which presents as an intracranial translucency (IT) between the brain stem and choroid plexus, is easily visible. We measured the anteroposterior diameter of the fourth ventricle in 200 normal fetuses and in four fetuses with spina bifida. RESULTS: In the normal fetuses the fourth ventricle was always visible and the median anteroposterior diameter increased from 1.5 mm at a crown-rump length (CRL) of 45 mm to 2.5 mm at a CRL of 84 mm. In the four fetuses with spina bifida the ventricle was compressed by the caudally displaced hindbrain and no IT could be seen. CONCLUSION: The mid-sagittal view of the face as routinely used in screening for chromosomal defects can also be used for early detection of open spina bifida.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.7329

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The spine should be carefully evaluated in cases where spina bifida is suspected from the presence of anomalies in the posterior fossa.

    “Notably, the spine should be carefully evaluated in cases where spina bifida is suspected from the presence of anomalies in the posterior fossa [55,56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaoui, R., Benoit, B., Mitkowska‐Wozniak, H., Heling, K. S., & Nicolaides, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Princess Grace Hospital Centre (MC)
  • Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine (GB)
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-24
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
249-252
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2117003820
Cited by
321
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 30
FWCI
21.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
spina bifida, intracranial translucency, fourth ventricle, prenatal diagnosis, first-trimester ultrasound, nuchal translucency, nasal bone, cranial ultrasound
MeSH terms
Cerebellum, Face, Female, Gestational Age, Head, Humans, Lumbosacral Region, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Spinal Dysraphism, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length, Fourth Ventricle, Nuchal Translucency Measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review