The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate our experience with the diagnosis and treatment of Cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods: During a 6‐year period, 12 cases of Cesarean scar pregnancy were diagnosed using transvaginal color Doppler sonography and treated conservatively to preserve fertility. Incidence, gestational age, sonographic findings, β‐human chorionic gonadotropin ( β‐hCG) levels, flow profiles of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound, and methods of treatment were recorded. Results: The incidence of Cesarean scar pregnancy was 1:2216 and its rate was 6.1% in women with an ectopic pregnancy and at least one previous Cesarean section. Gestational age at diagnosis ranged from 5 + 0 to 12 + 4 weeks. The time interval from the last Cesarean section to the diagnosis of Cesarean scar pregnancy ranged from 6 months to 12 years. High‐velocity and low‐impedance subtrophoblastic flow (resistance index, 0.38) persisted until β‐hCG declined to normal. Patients were treated as follows: transvaginal ultrasound‐guided injection of methotrexate into the embryo or gestational sac (n = 3), transabdominal ultrasound‐guided injection of methotrexate (n = 2), transabdominal ultrasound‐guided injection of methotrexate followed by systemic methotrexate administration (n = 2), systemic methotrexate administration alone (n = 2), dilatation and curettage (n = 2), or local resection of the gestation mass (n = 1). Eleven of the 12 patients preserved their reproductive capacity; the remaining patient, treated by dilatation and curettage, underwent a hysterectomy because of profuse vaginal bleeding. The Cesarean scar mass regressed from 2 months to as long as 1 year after treatment. Uterine rupture occurred in one patient during the following pregnancy at 38 + 3 weeks' gestational age. Conclusion: Ultrasound‐guided methotrexate injection emerges as the treatment of choice to terminate Cesarean scar pregnancy. Surgical or invasive techniques, including dilatation and curettage are not recommended for Cesarean scar pregnancy due to high morbidity and poor prognosis. Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vial, Y., Petignat, P., & Hohlfeld, P. (2000) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00300-2.x · Cited by 527
THE FAMILY DOCTOR IN THE CONTEXT OF BRITAIN'S SOCIAL SERVICES.
Crooks, J. S., Clark, C. G., Hb, C., & Wb, M. (1965) · PubMed · Cited by 401
An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar
Godin, P., Bassil, S., & Donnez, J. (1997) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81930-9 · Cited by 328
Sonographic evolution of cornual pregnancies treated without surgery.
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Monteagudo, A., Matera, C., & Cr, V. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 301
Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus--an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report.
Jv, L., & Mh, S. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 230
Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation
Rageth, J. (1999) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00446-3 · Cited by 227
Follow up and outcome of isthmic pregnancy located in a previous caesarean section scar
Herman, A., Weinraub, Z., Avrech, O., Maymon, R., Ron‐El, R., & Bukovsky, Y. (1995) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10855.x · Cited by 192
Transvaginal Color Doppler Assessment of the Uteroplacental Circulation in Early Pregnancy
(1991) · Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography · doi:10.1177/875647939100700433 · Cited by 168
Case Report:Laparoscopic management of an ectopic pregnancy in a previous Caesarean section scar
Lee, C.-L. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.5.1234 · Cited by 151
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean and Uterine Rupture Rates in California
Gregory, K. D., Korst, L. M., Cane, P., Platt, L. D., & Kahn, K. L. (1999) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00422-6 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review
Panelli, D. M., Phillips, C. H., & Brady, P. C. (2015) · Fertility Research and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40738-015-0008-z · Cited by 279
Maymon, R., Halperin, R., Mendlovic, S., Schneider, D., & Herman, A. (2004) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmh042 · Cited by 272
Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery
Clark, E. A. S., & Silver, R. M. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.028 · Cited by 253
Jurkovic, D., Knez, J., Appiah, A., Farahani, L., Mavrelos, D., & Ross, J. A. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15857 · Cited by 158
Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign
Cali, G., Forlani, F., Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J., Minneci, G., & D'Antonio, F. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.16216 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Seow, K. ‐., Huang, L. ‐., Lin, Y. ‐., Yan‐Sheng Lin, M., Tsai, Y. ‐., & Hwang, J. ‐.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-253
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2120978257
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 11.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.974
- The paper
- Seow, K. ‐., Huang, L. ‐., Lin, Y. ‐., Yan‐Sheng Lin, M., Tsai, Y. ‐., & Hwang, J. ‐. (2004). Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.