Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 616

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management

Open access
Seow, K.‐M., Huang, L.‐W., Lin, Y.‐H., Yan‐Sheng Lin, M., Tsai, Y.‐L., Hwang, J.‐L.·2004·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate our experience with the diagnosis and treatment of Cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods: During a 6‐year period, 12 cases of Cesarean scar pregnancy were diagnosed using transvaginal color Doppler sonography and treated conservatively to preserve fertility. Incidence, gestational age, sonographic findings, β‐human chorionic gonadotropin ( β‐hCG) levels, flow profiles of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound, and methods of treatment were recorded. Results: The incidence of Cesarean scar pregnancy was 1:2216 and its rate was 6.1% in women with an ectopic pregnancy and at least one previous Cesarean section. Gestational age at diagnosis ranged from 5 + 0 to 12 + 4 weeks. The time interval from the last Cesarean section to the diagnosis of Cesarean scar pregnancy ranged from 6 months to 12 years. High‐velocity and low‐impedance subtrophoblastic flow (resistance index, 0.38) persisted until β‐hCG declined to normal. Patients were treated as follows: transvaginal ultrasound‐guided injection of methotrexate into the embryo or gestational sac (n = 3), transabdominal ultrasound‐guided injection of methotrexate (n = 2), transabdominal ultrasound‐guided injection of methotrexate followed by systemic methotrexate administration (n = 2), systemic methotrexate administration alone (n = 2), dilatation and curettage (n = 2), or local resection of the gestation mass (n = 1). Eleven of the 12 patients preserved their reproductive capacity; the remaining patient, treated by dilatation and curettage, underwent a hysterectomy because of profuse vaginal bleeding. The Cesarean scar mass regressed from 2 months to as long as 1 year after treatment. Uterine rupture occurred in one patient during the following pregnancy at 38 + 3 weeks' gestational age. Conclusion: Ultrasound‐guided methotrexate injection emerges as the treatment of choice to terminate Cesarean scar pregnancy. Surgical or invasive techniques, including dilatation and curettage are not recommended for Cesarean scar pregnancy due to high morbidity and poor prognosis. Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.974

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 616

Metadata

Authors
Seow, K. ‐., Huang, L. ‐., Lin, Y. ‐., Yan‐Sheng Lin, M., Tsai, Y. ‐., & Hwang, J. ‐.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-17
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
247-253
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2120978257
Cited by
616
References
16
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.974
The paper
Seow, K. ‐., Huang, L. ‐., Lin, Y. ‐., Yan‐Sheng Lin, M., Tsai, Y. ‐., & Hwang, J. ‐. (2004). Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.974

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.