The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory and language of climate change communication
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Climate change communication has become a salient topic in science and society. It has grown to be something like a booming industry alongside more established ‘communication enterprises’, such as health communication, risk communication, and science communication. This article situates the theory of climate change communication within theoretical developments in the field of science communication. It discusses the importance and difficulties inherent in talking about climate change to different types of publics using various types of communication tools and strategies. It engages with the difficult issue of the relationship between climate change communication and behavior change, and it focuses, in particular, on the role of language (metaphors, words, strategies, frames, and narratives) in conveying climate change issues to stakeholders. In the process, it attempts to provide an overview of emerging theories of climate change communication, theories that recently have begun to proliferate quite dramatically. In some cases, we can, therefore only provide signposts to the most relevant research that is being carried out with regard to climate change communication without being able to engage with all its aspects. We end with an assessment of how communication could be improved in light of the theories and practices discussed in this article. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is categorized under: Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Communication Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Sociology/Anthropology of Climate Knowledge
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns
Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019810002700506 · Cited by 3,216
Whitmarsh, L. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662506073088 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Youth Mobilization to Stop Global Climate Change: Narratives and Impact
Han, H., & Ahn, S. W. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104127 · Cited by 348
The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries
Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.569 · Cited by 334
Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2017) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 · Cited by 203
Public understanding of climate change terminology
Bruine de Bruin, W., Rabinovich, L., Weber, K., Babboni, M., Dean, M., & Ignon, L. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03183-0 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. J.
- Venue
- Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-110
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135525071
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory and language of climate change communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wcc.0
- The paper
- Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. J. (2009). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.