The DOI matches its Crossref record; 203 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions
Abstract
This overview describes the anthropogenic drivers of global climate change, reviews the behavioral and psychological responses to its impacts (including barriers to behavior change), considers behavior‐focused intervention strategies, and suggests future directions for research. In doing so, it demonstrates why and how behavioral science is crucial for confronting the complex challenges posed by global climate change. The human dimensions of climate change are discussed, followed by descriptions of key theoretical models for explaining and predicting climate‐relevant behavior, issues and distinctions in studying human behavior in response to global climate change, an account of psychological (as opposed to structural) adaptation and its behavioral sequelae, the many psychological barriers to behavior change in this context, and behavior‐focused intervention strategies. The overview concludes with suggestions for researchers interested in advancing knowledge about behavior change and psychological responses to climate change. When knowledge about human behavior, cognitions, and psychological adaptation is integrated with that produced by researchers in related social and natural science disciplines, the result will facilitate solutions to this massive shared challenge.WIREs Clim Change 2011, 2:801–827. doi: 10.1002/wcc.143 This article is categorized under:Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Behavior Change and Responses
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–203 of 203
Energy efficiency and sustainable consumption: dealing with the rebound effect
Sorrell, S. (2008) · Figshare · Cited by 15
The USE of theory in applied social psychology
Schultz, P. W., & Estrada-Hollenbeck, M. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801921.002 · Cited by 9
Brewer, J. F., & Assessment, A. (2009) · Cited by 8
Cited by
On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation
Biesbroek, G. R., Klostermann, J. E. M., Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Kabat, P. (2013) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y · Cited by 677
Understanding household energy consumption behavior: The contribution of energy big data analytics
Zhou, K., & Yang, S. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.001 · Cited by 398
Vermeir, I., Weijters, B., De Houwer, J., Geuens, M., Slabbinck, H., Spruyt, A., Van Kerckhove, A., Van Lippevelde, W., De Steur, H., & Verbeke, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01603 · Cited by 365
Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries
Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj5778 · Cited by 269
Changing Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020) · The Handbook of Behavior Change · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.002 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Gifford, R., Kormos, C., & McIntyre, A.
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 801-827
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W2125952301
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 203
- FWCI
- 27.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
