The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review
Abstract
The study of climate change communication has become an important research field. As stakeholders such as scientists, politicians, corporations, or NGOs increasingly turn to the Internet and social media for providing information and mobilizing support, and as an increasing number of people use these media, online communication on climate change and climate politics has become a relevant topic. This article reviews the available scholarly literature on the role of online and social media in climate communication. It analyzes how stakeholders use online communication strategically, showing, for example, that climate scientists and scientific institutions do not seem to be major players in online debates about climate change and climate politics. Furthermore, it highlights the characteristics of online climate communication, outlining, for example, that although (or because) many stakeholders participate online, this does not lead to robust scientific information or better debates. Eventually, the review assesses what is known about the uses and effects of online climate communication, showing that impacts on the broader public seem to be limited so far. Research desiderata are identified in the end, and directions for further studies are shown.WIREs Clim Change 2012, 3:527–543. doi: 10.1002/wcc.191 This article is categorized under:Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Communication
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
O’Reilly, T. (2012) · The Social Media Reader · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814764077.003.0008 · Cited by 5,601
Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 2,980
Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts
Austin, J. (1982) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(82)90228-3 · Cited by 2,883
Castells, M. (2009) · Cited by 2,619
Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements
Jenkins, J. C. (1983) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002523 · Cited by 1,867
Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-1641 · Cited by 1,427
Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology
(1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563737 · Cited by 1,342
Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions
Moser, S. C. (2010) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.11 · Cited by 1,229
Cited by
Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change
Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Hugo Lambert, F. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006 · Cited by 631
The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries
Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.569 · Cited by 334
Climate change on Twitter: Content, media ecology and information sharing behaviour
Veltri, G. A., & Atanasova, D. (2017) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662515613702 · Cited by 217
Echo chambers of denial: Explaining user comments on climate change
Walter, S., Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1394893 · Cited by 158
“The news media coverage – and especially online news – is often more divided, which provides a forum for climate-skeptical voices that challenge these assumptions (Schäfer, 2012).”
BackgroundAlliance of antagonism: Counterpublics and polarization in online climate change communication
Kaiser, J., & Puschmann, C. (2017) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/2057047317732350 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Schäfer, M. S.
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-13
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 527-543
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W2152040645
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 32.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wcc.191
- The paper
- Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review. WIREs Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.