Cited by 165Climate Change and GeoengineeringEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Ethics and geoengineering: reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal

Preston, Christopher J.·2013·WIREs Climate Change

Abstract

After two decades of failure by the international community to respond adequately to the threat of global climate change, discussions of the possibility of geoengineering a cooler climate have recently proliferated. Alongside the considerable optimism that these technologies have generated, there has also been wide acknowledgement of significant ethical concerns. Ethicists, social scientists, and experts in governance have begun the work of addressing these concerns. The plethora of ethical issues raised by geoengineering creates challenges for those who wish to survey them. The issues are here separated out according to the temporal spaces in which they first arise. Some crop up when merely contemplating the prospect of geoengineering. Others appear as research gets underway. Another set of issues attend the actual implementation of the technologies. A further set occurs when planning for the cessation of climate engineering. Two cautions about this organizational schema are in order. First, even if the issues first arise in the temporal spaces identified, they do not stay completely contained within them. A good reason to object to the prospect of geoengineering, for example, will likely remain a good reason to object to its implementation. Second, the ethical concerns intensify or weaken depending on the technology under consideration. The wide range of geoengineering technologies currently being discussed makes it prudent that each technique should be evaluated individually for its ethical merit.WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:23–37. doi: 10.1002/wcc.198 This article is categorized under:Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Ethics and Climate Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcc.198

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial study highlights the potential to use SAI to optimize or create designer climates.

    “Initial study in this area for SAI highlights the potential to use SAI to 'optimize' or create 'designer climates' (Preston, 2013; Talberg et al., 2018).”
  • There has been significant debate about whether it is ethically responsible to research solar geoengineering.

    “Because of these issues, there has been significant debate about whether it is ethically responsible to research this topic [420,640].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [640]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 165

Authors
Preston, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Montana (US)
Corresponding author
Preston, Christopher J.
Venue
WIREs Climate Change
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-08
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
23-37
ISSN
  • 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-7799
OpenAlex
W1942828765
Cited by
165
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • The Mathematics Enthusiast (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
ethics of geoengineering, solar radiation management, carbon dioxide removal, geoengineering, climate change, ethical considerations, geoengineering governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review