Ethics and geoengineering: reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal
Abstract
After two decades of failure by the international community to respond adequately to the threat of global climate change, discussions of the possibility of geoengineering a cooler climate have recently proliferated. Alongside the considerable optimism that these technologies have generated, there has also been wide acknowledgement of significant ethical concerns. Ethicists, social scientists, and experts in governance have begun the work of addressing these concerns. The plethora of ethical issues raised by geoengineering creates challenges for those who wish to survey them. The issues are here separated out according to the temporal spaces in which they first arise. Some crop up when merely contemplating the prospect of geoengineering. Others appear as research gets underway. Another set of issues attend the actual implementation of the technologies. A further set occurs when planning for the cessation of climate engineering. Two cautions about this organizational schema are in order. First, even if the issues first arise in the temporal spaces identified, they do not stay completely contained within them. A good reason to object to the prospect of geoengineering, for example, will likely remain a good reason to object to its implementation. Second, the ethical concerns intensify or weaken depending on the technology under consideration. The wide range of geoengineering technologies currently being discussed makes it prudent that each technique should be evaluated individually for its ethical merit.WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:23–37. doi: 10.1002/wcc.198 This article is categorized under:Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Ethics and Climate Change
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initial study highlights the potential to use SAI to optimize or create designer climates.
“Initial study in this area for SAI highlights the potential to use SAI to 'optimize' or create 'designer climates' (Preston, 2013; Talberg et al., 2018).”
From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as Preston, 2013
There has been significant debate about whether it is ethically responsible to research solar geoengineering.
“Because of these issues, there has been significant debate about whether it is ethically responsible to research this topic [420,640].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [640]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 165
- Authors
- Preston, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Montana (US)
- Corresponding author
- Preston, Christopher J.
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-37
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W1942828765
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- The Mathematics Enthusiast (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Keywords
- ethics of geoengineering, solar radiation management, carbon dioxide removal, geoengineering, climate change, ethical considerations, geoengineering governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review