The DOI matches its Crossref record; 208 of the 208 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unraveling the influence of atmospheric evaporative demand on drought and its response to climate change
Abstract
This review examines the role of the atmospheric evaporative demand (AED) in drought. AED is a complex concept and here we discuss possible AED definitions, the subsequent metrics to measure and estimate AED, and the different physical drivers that control it. The complex influence of AED on meteorological, environmental/agricultural and hydrological droughts is discussed, stressing the important spatial differences related to the climatological conditions. Likewise, AED influence on drought has implications regarding how different drought metrics consider AED in their attempts to quantify drought severity. Throughout the article, we assess literature findings with respect to: (a) recent drought trends and future projections; (b) the several uncertainties related to data availability; (c) the sensitivity of current drought metrics to AED; and (d) possible roles that both the radiative and physiological effects of increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentrations may play as we progress into the future. All these issues preclude identifying a simple effect of the AED on drought severity. Rather it calls for different evaluations of drought impacts and trends under future climate scenarios, considering the complex feedbacks governing the climate system. This article is categorized under: Paleoclimates and Current Trends > Earth System Behavior
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–208 of 208
Chai, R., Sun, S., Chen, H., & Zhou, S. (2018) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.13252 · Cited by 30
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Bidegain, M. P., Tomàs‐Burguera, M., Domínguez‐Castro, F., Kenawy, A. E., McVicar, T. R., Azorín-Molina, C., López‐Moreno, J. I., Nieto, R., Gimeno, L., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.5179 · Cited by 28
Self-citationLobo, A., & Maisongrande, P. (2006) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-10-151-2006 · Cited by 27
Trends in ecosystem recovery from drought
Seneviratne, S. I., & Ciais, P. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/548164a · Cited by 26
Nackley, L. L., Betzelberger, A. M., Skowno, A. L., West, A. G., Ripley, B. S., Bond, W. J., & Midgley, G. F. (2018) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.06.018 · Cited by 25
Qin, M., Hao, L., Sun, L., Liu, Y., & Sun, G. (2018) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12714 · Cited by 25
Recent changes and drivers of the atmospheric evaporative demand in the Canary Islands
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Azorín-Molina, C., Sanchez‐Lorenzo, A., Kenawy, A. E., Martín‐Hernández, N., Peña‐Gallardo, M., Beguería, S., & Tomàs‐Burguera, M. (2016) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-20-3393-2016 · Cited by 17
Self-citationDrought Variability and Trends over the Central United States in the Instrumental Record
Mo, K. C., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2018) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-17-0225.1 · Cited by 14
Cited by
Hari, V., Rakovec, O., Markonis, Y., Hanel, M., & Kumar, R. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68872-9 · Cited by 485
Zhang, X., Hao, Z., Singh, V. P., Zhang, Y., Feng, S., Xu, Y., & Hao, F. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156021 · Cited by 429
Heat Waves: Physical Understanding and Scientific Challenges
Barriopedro, D., García‐Herrera, R., Ordóñez, C., Miralles, D. G., & Salcedo‐Sanz, S. (2023) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2022rg000780 · Cited by 404
Self-citationMateria, S., Ardilouze, C., Prodhomme, C., Donat, M. G., Benassi, M., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Peano, D., Caron, L.-P., Ruggieri, P., & Gualdi, S. (2022) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-021-05815-8 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Vicente‐Serrano, S. M., McVicar, T. R., Miralles, D. G., Yang, Y., & Tomas‐Burguera, M.
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-19
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W2996256338
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 208
- FWCI
- 13.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
