The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electron propagator theory: an approach to prediction and interpretation in quantum chemistry
Abstract
Electron propagator theory provides a practical means of calculating electron binding energies, Dyson orbitals, and ground‐state properties from first principles. This approach to ab initio electronic structure theory also facilitates the interpretation of its quantitative predictions in terms of concepts that closely resemble those of one‐electron theories. An explanation of the physical meaning of the electron propagator's poles and residues is followed by a discussion of its couplings to more complicated propagators. These relationships are exploited in superoperator theory and lead to a compact form of the electron propagator that is derived by matrix partitioning. Expressions for reference‐state properties, relationships to the extended Koopmans's theorem technique for evaluating electron binding energies, and connections between Dyson orbitals and transition probabilities follow from this discussion. The inverse form of the Dyson equation for the electron propagator leads to a strategy for obtaining electron binding energies and Dyson orbitals that generalizes the Hartree–Fock equations through the introduction of the self‐energy operator. All relaxation and correlation effects reside in this operator, which has an energy‐dependent, nonlocal form that is systematically improvable. Perturbative arguments produce several, convenient (e.g. partial third order, outer valence Green's function, and second‐order, transition‐operator) approximations for the evaluation of valence ionization energies, electron affinities, and core ionization energies. Renormalized approaches based on Hartree–Fock or approximate Brueckner orbitals are employed when correlation effects become qualitatively important. Reference‐state total energies based on contour integrals in the complex plane and gradients of electron binding energies enable exploration of final‐state potential energy surfaces. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is categorized under: Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valence one-electron and shake-up ionization bands of carbon clusters. II. The Cn (n=4,6,8,10) rings
Deleuze, M. S., Giuffreda, M. G., François, J.-P., & Cederbaum, L. S. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.481125 · Cited by 40
Cited by
The GW approximation: content, successes and limitations
Reining, L. (2018) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1344 · Cited by 284
Combining Wave Function Methods with Density Functional Theory for Excited States
Ghosh, S., Verma, P., Cramer, C. J., Gagliardi, L., & Truhlar, D. G. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00193 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Ortiz, J. V.
- Venue
- WIREs Computational Molecular Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-25
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-142
- ISSN
- 1759-0876 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-0884
- OpenAlex
- W2061051838
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.