Cited by 25Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksAdvanced Graph Neural Networks

Formatting biological big data for modern machine learning in drug discovery

Duran‐Frigola, Miquel, Fernández‐Torras, Adrià, Bertoni, Martino, Aloy, Patrick·2019·WIREs Computational Molecular Science

Abstract

Biological data is accumulating at an unprecedented rate, escalating the role of data‐driven methods in computational drug discovery. This scenario is favored by recent advances in machine learning algorithms, which are optimized for huge datasets and consistently beat the predictive performance of previous art, rapidly approaching human expert reasoning. The urge to couple biological data to cutting‐edge machine learning has spurred developments in data integration and knowledge representation, especially in the form of heterogeneous, multiplex and semantically‐rich biological networks. Today, thanks to the propitious rise in knowledge embedding techniques, these large and complex biological networks can be converted to a vector format that suits the majority of machine learning implementations. Here, we explain why this can be particularly transformative for drug discovery where, for decades, customary chemoinformatics methods have employed vector descriptors of compound structures as the standard input of their prediction tasks. A common vector format to represent biology and chemistry may push biological information into most of the existing steps of the drug discovery pipeline, boosting the accuracy of predictions and uncovering connections between small molecules and other biological entities such as targets or diseases. This article is categorized under: Computer and Information Science > Databases and Expert Systems Computer and Information Science > Chemoinformatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcms.1408

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This caveat is common to other machine-learning applications where embedded representations of entities are favored over sparser, more explicit ones.

    “This caveat is common to other machine-learning applications (e.g., natural language processing) where embedded representations of entities are favored over sparser, more explicit ones37.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 158 · Cited by 25

Authors
Duran‐Frigola, M., Fernández‐Torras, A., Bertoni, M., & Aloy, P.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Research in Biomedicine (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Duran‐Frigola, Miquel
  • Aloy, Patrick
Venue
WIREs Computational Molecular Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-27
Volume
9
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1759-0876 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-0884
OpenAlex
W2907916870
Cited by
25
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (SysPharmAD: 614944)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Keywords
knowledge embedding, biological networks, cheminformatics, drug discovery, data integration, knowledge representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review