The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Columbus—a program system for advanced multireference theory calculations
Abstract
The COLUMBUS Program System allows high‐level quantum chemical calculations based on the multiconfiguration self‐consistent field, multireference configuration interaction with singles and doubles, and the multireference averaged quadratic coupled cluster methods. The latter method includes size‐consistency corrections at the multireference level. Nonrelativistic (NR) and spin–orbit calculations are available within multireference configuration interaction (MRCI). A prominent feature of COLUMBUS is the availability of analytic energy gradients and nonadiabatic coupling vectors for NR MRCI. This feature allows efficient optimization of stationary points and surface crossings (minima on the crossing seam). Typical applications are systematic surveys of energy surfaces in ground and excited states including bond breaking. Wave functions of practically any sophistication can be constructed limited primarily by the size of the CI expansion rather than by its complexity. A massively parallel CI step allows state‐of‐the art calculations with up to several billion configurations. Electrostatic embedding of point charges into the molecular Hamiltonian gives access to quantum mechanical/molecular mechanics calculations for all wave functions available in COLUMBUS. The analytic gradient modules allow on‐the‐fly nonadiabatic photodynamical simulations of interesting chemical and biological problems. Thus, COLUMBUS provides a wide range of highly sophisticated tools with which a large variety of interesting quantum chemical problems can be studied. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011 1 191‐199 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.25 This article is categorized under: Software > Quantum Chemistry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
OpenMolcas: From Source Code to Insight
Fdez. Galván, I., Vacher, M., Alavi, A., Angeli, C., Aquilante, F., Autschbach, J., Bao, J. J., Bokarev, S. I., Bogdanov, N. A., Carlson, R. K., et al. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00532 · Cited by 1,114
Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Quantum Molecular Dynamics
Curchod, B. F. E., & Martínez, T. J. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00423 · Cited by 709
The OpenMolcas Web : A Community-Driven Approach to Advancing Computational Chemistry
Li Manni, G., Fdez. Galván, I., Alavi, A., Aleotti, F., Aquilante, F., Autschbach, J., Avagliano, D., Baiardi, A., Bao, J. J., Battaglia, S., et al. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00182 · Cited by 396
Self-citationMultireference Electron Correlation Methods: Journeys along Potential Energy Surfaces
Park, J. W., Al-Saadon, R., MacLeod, M. K., Shiozaki, T., & Vlaisavljevich, B. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00496 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Lischka, H., Müller, T., Szalay, P. G., Shavitt, I., Pitzer, R. M., & Shepard, R.
- Venue
- WIREs Computational Molecular Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-21
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-199
- ISSN
- 1759-0876 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-0884
- OpenAlex
- W2012400829
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Columbus—a program system for advanced multireference theory calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wcms.25
- The paper
- Lischka, H., Müller, T., Szalay, P. G., Shavitt, I., Pitzer, R. M., & Shepard, R. (2011). Columbus—a program system for advanced multireference theory calculations. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.