The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The COSMO and COSMO‐RS solvation models
Open accessAbstract
The conductor‐like screening model COSMO, a variant of the dielectric continuum solvation models, has become very popular due to its algorithmic simplicity, numerical stability, and its great insensitivity with respect to outlying charge errors. The advanced model COSMO‐RS, i.e., COSMO for realistic solvation, is a statistical thermodynamics theory based on COSMO polarization charge densities, which overcomes many of the limitations and theoretical shortcomings of dielectric continuum models. Due to its ability to treat mixtures at variable temperatures, it has become very popular in chemical engineering and in wide areas of physical and medicinal chemistry. COSMO‐RS currently may be considered as the most accurate model for the prediction of solvation energies. This article provides a short description of the basic concepts of both the models, of the differences with other solvation models and of their application areas. Finally, direct COSMO‐RS, a recent direct integration of the COSMO‐RS concept into quantum chemical calculations, is briefly described. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011 1 699–709 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.56 This article is categorized under: Molecular and Statistical Mechanics > Free Energy Methods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
van der Waals Volumes and Radii
Bondi, A. (1964) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100785a001 · Cited by 19,350
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B., & Cammi, R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9904009 · Cited by 16,868
Barone, V., & Cossi, M. (1998) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp9716997 · Cited by 10,121
Klamt, A., & Schüürmann, G. (1993) · J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 · doi:10.1039/p29930000799 · Cited by 9,445
Self-citationMiertuš, S., Scrocco, E., & Tomasi, J. (1981) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/0301-0104(81)85090-2 · Cited by 8,937
Cossi, M., Rega, N., Scalmani, G., & Barone, V. (2003) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10189 · Cited by 8,056
Cancès, E., Mennucci, B., & Tomasi, J. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.474659 · Cited by 6,926
Abrams, D. S., & Prausnitz, J. M. (1975) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690210115 · Cited by 4,669
Klamt, A. (1995) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100007a062 · Cited by 4,118
Self-citationCossi, M., Scalmani, G., Rega, N., & Barone, V. (2002) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1480445 · Cited by 2,394
Cited by
Dispersion-Corrected Mean-Field Electronic Structure Methods
Grimme, S., Hansen, A., Brandenburg, J. G., & Bannwarth, C. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00533 · Cited by 1,621
Mennucci, B. (2012) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1086 · Cited by 1,051
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Computational Approach to Molecular Catalysis by 3d Transition Metals: Challenges and Opportunities
Vogiatzis, K. D., Polynski, M. V., Kirkland, J. K., Townsend, J., Hashemi, A., Liu, C., & Pidko, E. A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00361 · Cited by 423
Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology**
Baiardi, A., Christandl, M., & Reiher, M. (2023) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202300120 · Cited by 93
Jeliński, T., & Cysewski, P. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-018-3700-1 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Klamt, A.
- Venue
- WIREs Computational Molecular Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-28
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 699-709
- ISSN
- 1759-0876 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-0884
- OpenAlex
- W2146798438
- Cited by
- 849
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 18.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
