The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nonadiabatic dynamics with trajectory surface hopping method
Abstract
The trajectory surface hopping (TSH) method is a general methodology for dynamics propagation of nonadiabatic systems. It is based on the hypothesis that the time evolution of a wave packet through a potential‐energy branching region can be approximated by an ensemble of independent semiclassical trajectories stochastically distributed among the branched surfaces. As it was proposed about 40 years ago, the TSH methodology has become one of the main tools for nonadiabatic dynamics propagation in molecular physics and chemistry. One reason for this success lies on its intuitive conceptual background allied to its high computational efficiency when compared to full quantum mechanical propagation. In this work, the TSH method is reviewed and applications from different fields are surveyed. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011 1 620–633 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.64 This article is categorized under: Theoretical and Physical Chemistry > Reaction Dynamics and Kinetics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Chemistry and Quantum Materials Science
Bauer, B., Bravyi, S., Motta, M., & Chan, G. K.-L. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00829 · Cited by 848
Recent Advances and Perspectives on Nonadiabatic Mixed Quantum–Classical Dynamics
Crespo-Otero, R., & Barbatti, M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 · Cited by 733
Self-citationMachine learning molecular dynamics for the simulation of infrared spectra
Gastegger, M., Behler, J., & Marquetand, P. (2017) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c7sc02267k · Cited by 556
Zheng, Q., Chu, W., Zhao, C., Zhang, L., Guo, H., Wang, Y., Jiang, X., & Zhao, J. (2019) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1411 · Cited by 452
Understanding the Surface Hopping View of Electronic Transitions and Decoherence
Subotnik, J. E., Jain, A., Landry, B., Petit, A., Ouyang, W., & Bellonzi, N. (2016) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112245 · Cited by 438
Multireference Electron Correlation Methods: Journeys along Potential Energy Surfaces
Park, J. W., Al-Saadon, R., MacLeod, M. K., Shiozaki, T., & Vlaisavljevich, B. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00496 · Cited by 155
Excited-State Aromaticity Improves Molecular Motors: A Computational Analysis
Oruganti, B., Wang, J., & Durbeej, B. (2017) · Organic Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02257 · Cited by 47
Wang, J., Oruganti, B., & Durbeej, B. (2019) · ChemPhotoChem · doi:10.1002/cptc.201800268 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbatti, M.
- Venue
- WIREs Computational Molecular Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 620-633
- ISSN
- 1759-0876 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-0884
- OpenAlex
- W2078294955
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
