The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain asymmetry (animal)
Abstract
Once considered a uniquely human attribute, brain asymmetry has been proved to be ubiquitous among non‐human animals. A synthetic review of evidence of animal lateralization in the motor, sensory, cognitive, and affective domains is provided, together with a discussion of its development and possible biological functions. It is argued that investigation of brain asymmetry in a comparative perspective may favor the link between classical neuropsychological studies and modern developmental and evolutionary biology approaches. WIREs Cogni Sci 2011 2 146–157 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.100 This article is categorized under: Psychology > Comparative Psychology Neuroscience > Behavior
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis
Maguire, E. A., Woollett, K., & Spiers, H. J. (2006) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20233 · Cited by 918
Scala naturae: Why there is no theory in comparative psychology.
Hodos, W., & Campbell, C. B. G. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027523 · Cited by 583
Cited by
Brain Lateralization: A Comparative Perspective
Güntürkün, O., Ströckens, F., & Ocklenburg, S. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2019 · Cited by 484
Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics
Brown, C. (2015) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0 · Cited by 419
Siniscalchi, M., d’Ingeo, S., & Quaranta, A. (2016) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.011 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallortigara, G., Chiandetti, C., & Sovrano, V. A.
- Venue
- WIREs Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-21
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 146-157
- ISSN
- 1939-5078 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5086
- OpenAlex
- W2065391921
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
