Cited by 201Social and Intergroup PsychologyFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The representation of self and person knowledge in the medial prefrontal cortex

Open access
Wagner, Dylan D., Haxby, James V., Heatherton, Todd F.·2012·WIREs Cognitive Science

Abstract

Nearly 40 years ago, social psychologists began applying the information processing framework of cognitive psychology to the question of how humans understand and represent knowledge about themselves and others. This approach gave rise to the immensely successful field of social cognition and fundamentally changed the way in which social psychological phenomena are studied. More recently, social scientists of many stripes have turned to the methods of cognitive neuroscience to understand the neural basis of social cognition. A pervasive finding from this research is that social knowledge, be it about one's self or of others, is represented in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). This review focuses on the social cognitive neuroscience of self and person knowledge in the MPFC. We begin with a brief historical overview of social cognition, followed by a review of recent and influential research on the brain basis of self and person knowledge. In the latter half of this review, we discuss the role of familiarity and similarity in person perception and of spontaneous processes in self and other-referential cognition. Throughout, we discuss the myriad ways in which the social cognitive neuroscience approach has provided new insights into the nature and structure of self and person knowledge. WIREs Cogn Sci 2012, 3:451-470. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1183 This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Cognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcs.1183

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The medial frontal cortex region has been repeatedly identified as an appraisal dimension that facilitates social knowledge involving inferences of other's internal thoughts and their evaluation.

    “This region has been repeatedly identified as an appraisal dimension that facilitates social knowledge involving inferences of other's internal thoughts and their evaluation (for a review see Wagner et al., 2012 ).”

    From Male brain processing of the body odor of ovulating women compared to that of pregnant women (2021) · cites this paper as Wagner et al., 2012

    The Neural Representation of Self and Others section identifies the medial prefrontal cortex as a recurring focus in social cognition, and its Person Perception and Impression Formation subsection links the DMPFC to inferences about others’ mental states. The review also links the DMPFC to forming impressions, but it does not identify the region as an “appraisal dimension”; it notes that other regions contribute to the evaluative aspects of first impressions. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex is functionally involved when an individual reflects on unobservable mental states of others, known as social person knowledge, or predicts them under uncertainty.

    “The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex is functionally involved when an individual reflects on unobservable mental states of others, known as social person knowledge ( Dixon et al., 2017 ;Wagner et al., 2012 ), or predicts them under uncertainty (for a review see Isoda and Noritake, 2013 ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 221 · Cited by 201

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [76]Whalen PJ Davis FC Oler JA Kim H Kim JM Neta M Human amygdala responses to facial expressions of emotion The Human Amygdala Phelps EA Whalen PJ Guilford Press New York 2009
  2. [88]Mitchell JP Heatherton TF Components of a social brain Cognitive Neurosciences IV 951 958 Gazzaniga MS MIT Press Cambridge, MA 2009

Authors
Wagner, D. D., Haxby, J. V., & Heatherton, T. F.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Dylan D.
Venue
WIREs Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-07
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
451-470
ISSN
  • 1939-5078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5086
OpenAlex
W1995475925
Cited by
201
References
221
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059282)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, self-knowledge, person knowledge, person perception, social cognition, familiarity, similarity, self-referential processing, neural basis of social cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review