Cognitive and linguistic biases in morphology learning
Abstract
Morphology is the study of the relationship between form and meaning. The study of morphology involves understanding the rules and processes that underlie word formation, including the use and productivity of affixes, and the systems that create novel word forms. The present review explores these processes by examining the cognitive components that contribute to typological regularities among morphological systems across the world's language. The review will focus on research in morpheme segmentation, the suffixing preference, acquisition of morphophonology, and acquiring morphological categories and inflectional paradigms. The review will highlight research in a range of areas of linguistics, from child language acquisition, to computational modeling, to adult language learning experiments. In order to best understand the cognitive biases that shape morphological learning, a broad, interdisciplinary approach must be taken. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Linguistic Theory Linguistics > Language Acquisition Psychology > Language.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In L1 acquisition, high token frequency surface forms are produced earlier and more accurately than other forms and words inflected in lower token frequency forms.
“In L1 acquisition, high token frequency surface forms are produced earlier and more accurately in those forms compared to production in other forms and compared to production of other words that are inflected in lower token frequency forms (Aguado-Orea, 2004;Braine et al., 1990;Finley, 2018;Marchman, 1997).”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as Finley, 2018
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 166 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Finley, S.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Lutheran University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Finley, Sara
- ORCID
- Finley, Sara
- Venue
- WIREs Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e1467-e1467
- ISSN
- 1939-5078 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5086
- OpenAlex
- W2806222379
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 166
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- morphology learning, cognitive biases, morpheme segmentation, morphophonology, morphological categories, inflectional paradigms, word formation, affixes, child language acquisition, adult language learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review