The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reliability analysis for wind turbines
Open accessAbstract
Modern wind turbines are complex aerodynamic, mechanical and electrical machines incorporating sophisticated control systems. Wind turbines have been erected in increasing numbers in Europe, the USA and elsewhere. In Europe, Germany and Denmark have played a particularly prominent part in developing the technology, and both countries have installed large numbers of turbines. This article is concerned with understanding the historic reliability of modern wind turbines. The prime objective of the work is to extract information from existing data so that the reliability of large wind turbines can be predicted, particularly when installed offshore in the future. The article uses data collected from the Windstats survey to analyse the reliability of wind turbine components from historic German and Danish data. Windstats data have characteristics common to practical reliability surveys; for example, the number of failures is collected for each interval but the number of turbines varies in each interval. In this article, the authors use reliability analysis methods which are not only applicable to wind turbines but relate to any repairable system. Particular care is taken to compare results from the two populations to consider the validity of the data. The main purpose of the article is to discuss the practical methods of predicting large‐wind‐turbine reliability using grouped survey data from Windstats and to show how turbine design, turbine configuration, time, weather and possibly maintenance can affect the extracted results. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhou, W., Lou, C., Li, Z., Lu, L., & Yang, H. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.012 · Cited by 893
Wind turbine downtime and its importance for offshore deployment
Faulstich, S., Hahn, B., & Tavner, P. J. (2011) · Wind Energy · doi:10.1002/we.421 · Cited by 351
Self-citationMonitoring wind turbine gearboxes
Feng, Y., Qiu, Y., Crabtree, C. J., Long, H., & Tavner, P. J. (2013) · Wind Energy · doi:10.1002/we.1521 · Cited by 253
Self-citationAfridi, Y. S., Ahmad, K., & Hassan, L. (2022) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.7100 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Tavner, P. J., Xiang, J., & Spinato, F.
- Venue
- Wind Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 1095-4244 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1824
- OpenAlex
- W2083755244
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability analysis for wind turbines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/we.204
- The paper
- Tavner, P. J., Xiang, J., & Spinato, F. (2007). Reliability analysis for wind turbines. Wind Energy. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.