The DOI matches its Crossref record; 201 of the 201 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges
Open accessAbstract
Most machine learning algorithms are configured by a set of hyperparameters whose values must be carefully chosen and which often considerably impact performance. To avoid a time‐consuming and irreproducible manual process of trial‐and‐error to find well‐performing hyperparameter configurations, various automatic hyperparameter optimization (HPO) methods—for example, based on resampling error estimation for supervised machine learning—can be employed. After introducing HPO from a general perspective, this paper reviews important HPO methods, from simple techniques such as grid or random search to more advanced methods like evolution strategies, Bayesian optimization, Hyperband, and racing. This work gives practical recommendations regarding important choices to be made when conducting HPO, including the HPO algorithms themselves, performance evaluation, how to combine HPO with machine learning pipelines, runtime improvements, and parallelization. This article is categorized under: Algorithmic Development > Statistics Technologies > Machine Learning Technologies > Prediction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–201 of 201
(2014) · doi:10.5555/2627435.2697065
Cited by
General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Models
Molnar, C., König, G., Herbinger, J., Freiesleben, T., Dandl, S., Scholbeck, C. A., Casalicchio, G., Grosse-Wentrup, M., & Bischl, B. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04083-2_4 · Cited by 211
Self-citationMirzaei, S., Mao, H., Al-Nima, R. R. O., & Woo, W. L. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15010004 · Cited by 25
Mehraban, M. H., Mirzabeigi, S., Faraji, S., Soltanian-Zadeh, S., & Sepasgozar, S. M. E. (2025) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings15213950 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bischl, B., Binder, M., Lang, M., Pielok, T., Richter, J., Coors, S., Thomas, J., Ullmann, T., Becker, M., Boulesteix, A., Deng, D., & Lindauer, M.
- Venue
- WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-01-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1942-4787 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-4795
- OpenAlex
- W3179950556
- Cited by
- 930
- References
- 201
- FWCI
- 80.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.