Cited by 57

Addressing privacy concerns with wearable health monitoring technology

Sivakumar, C. L. V., Mone, Varda, Abdumukhtor, Rakhmanov·2024·WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery

Abstract

The growing popularity of wearable health devices like fitness trackers and smartwatches enables continuous personal health monitoring but also raises significant privacy concerns due to the real‐time collection of sensitive data. Many users are unaware of vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthorized access or discrimination if health information is revealed without consent. However, even informed users may willingly share data despite understanding privacy risks. The recent implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU and states taking initiatives to regulate privacy shows growing regulatory efforts to address these threats. This paper evaluates the key privacy threats posed specifically by consumer wearable devices. It provides a focused analysis of how health data could be exploited or shared without users' knowledge and the security flaws that enable such risks. Potential solutions including improving protections, empowering user control, enhancing transparency, and strengthening regulations are examined. However, it is argued that effective change requires balancing privacy risks with health benefits while also considering human decision‐making behaviors. The paper concludes by proposing a multifaceted approach to enable informed choices about wearable health data. This article is categorized under: Application Areas > Health Care Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Fairness in Data Mining Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Legal Issues

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/widm.1535

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proliferation of biometric data collection through wearables introduces significant risks to individuals and society, including cybersecurity breaches, data misuse, consent violations, discrimination against vulnerable populations, biometric persecution, and widespread surveillance.

    “However, the proliferation of biometric data collection through wearables also introduces significant risks to individuals and society.These include cybersecurity breaches, data misuse, consent violations, discrimination against vulnerable populations, biometric persecution, and widespread surveillance 25,26 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sivakumar, C. L. V., Mone, V., & Abdumukhtor, R.
Venue
WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-03-23
Volume
14
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1942-4787
  • 1942-4795
Cited by
57
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review