Addressing privacy concerns with wearable health monitoring technology
Abstract
The growing popularity of wearable health devices like fitness trackers and smartwatches enables continuous personal health monitoring but also raises significant privacy concerns due to the real‐time collection of sensitive data. Many users are unaware of vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthorized access or discrimination if health information is revealed without consent. However, even informed users may willingly share data despite understanding privacy risks. The recent implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU and states taking initiatives to regulate privacy shows growing regulatory efforts to address these threats. This paper evaluates the key privacy threats posed specifically by consumer wearable devices. It provides a focused analysis of how health data could be exploited or shared without users' knowledge and the security flaws that enable such risks. Potential solutions including improving protections, empowering user control, enhancing transparency, and strengthening regulations are examined. However, it is argued that effective change requires balancing privacy risks with health benefits while also considering human decision‐making behaviors. The paper concludes by proposing a multifaceted approach to enable informed choices about wearable health data. This article is categorized under: Application Areas > Health Care Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Fairness in Data Mining Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Legal Issues
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proliferation of biometric data collection through wearables introduces significant risks to individuals and society, including cybersecurity breaches, data misuse, consent violations, discrimination against vulnerable populations, biometric persecution, and widespread surveillance.
“However, the proliferation of biometric data collection through wearables also introduces significant risks to individuals and society.These include cybersecurity breaches, data misuse, consent violations, discrimination against vulnerable populations, biometric persecution, and widespread surveillance 25,26 .”
From Privacy in consumer wearable technologies: a living systematic analysis of data policies across leading manufacturers (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
Opportunities and challenges in the use of personal health data for health research
Bietz, M. J., Bloss, C. S., Calvert, S., Godino, J. G., Gregory, J., Claffey, M. P., Sheehan, J., & Patrick, K. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv118 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Ransomware attack associated with disruptions at adjacent emergency departments in the US.
Dameff, C., Tully, J., Chan, T. C., Castillo, E. M., Savage, S., Maysent, P., Hemmen, T. M., Clay, B. J., & Longhurst, C. A. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12270 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Privacy Issues in Wearable Technology: An Intrinsic Review
Kapoor, V., Singh, R., Reddy, R., & Churi, P. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3566918 · Cited by 31 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Merely password-protecting information is insufficient as hackers devise ever more sophisticated intrusion methods (Kapoor et al., 2020).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Doherty, C., Baldwin, M., Lambe, R., Altini, M., & Caulfield, B. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01757-1 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sivakumar, C. L. V., Mone, V., & Abdumukhtor, R.
- Venue
- WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-03-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1942-4787
- 1942-4795
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review