Cited by 2Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Correction

Open access
·2016·World Psychiatry

Abstract

It has been brought to our attention that in the References of the paper “Treatment engagement of individuals experiencing mental illness: review and update”, by Dixon et al, published in the February 2016 issue of World Psychiatry, the author in ref. 8 was reported incorrectly. The correct reference is: Stewart KD. Factors contributing to engagement during the initial stages of treatment for psychosis. Qual Health Res 2012;23:336-47.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20372

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
189-189
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W4251382078
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
treatment engagement, mental illness, psychosis, reference correction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review