The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond peak reservoir storage? A global estimate of declining water storage capacity in large reservoirs
Open accessAbstract
[1] Water storage is an important way to cope with temporal variation in water supply and demand. The storage capacity and the lifetime of water storage reservoirs can be significantly reduced by the inflow of sediments. A global, spatially explicit assessment of reservoir storage loss in conjunction with vulnerability to storage loss has not been done. We estimated the loss in reservoir capacity for a global data set of large reservoirs from 1901 to 2010, using modeled sediment flux data. We use spatially explicit population data sets as a proxy for storage demand and calculate storage capacity for all river basins globally. Simulations suggest that the net reservoir capacity is declining as a result of sedimentation (∼5% compared to the installed capacity). Combined with increasing need for storage, these losses challenge the sustainable management of reservoir operation and water resources management in many regions. River basins that are most vulnerable include those with a strong seasonal flow pattern and high population growth rates such as the major river basins in India and China. Decreasing storage capacity globally suggests that the role of reservoir water storage in offsetting sea-level rise is likely weakening and may be changing sign.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Global Hydrography Derived from Spaceborne Elevation Data
Lehner, B., Verdin, K., & Jarvis, A. (2008) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/2008eo100001 · Cited by 2,411
Cited by
Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers
Best, J. (2019) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0262-x · Cited by 1,315
Global sea-level budget 1993–present
WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group (2018) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-10-1551-2018 · Cited by 624
Hyper-resolution global hydrological modelling: what is next?: “Everywhere and locally relevant”
Bierkens, M. F. P., Bell, V. A., Burek, P., Chaney, N., Condon, L. E., David, C. H., de Roo, A., Döll, P., Drost, N., Famiglietti, J. S., et al. (2015) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.10391 · Cited by 391
Self-citationMartínez-Mena, M., Almagro, M., García-Franco, N., de Vente, J., García, E., & Boix-Fayos, C. (2019) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-16-1035-2019 · Cited by 14
“Several authors have suggested that alluvial settings are important nonquantified OC sinks (Wisser et al., 2013; Hoffmann et al., 2013; Ran et al., 2014) with mechanisms of OC stabilization that can be quite complex in semiarid and subhumid areas.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Wisser, D., Frolking, S., Hagen, S., & Bierkens, M. F. P.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5732-5739
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163288194
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond peak reservoir storage? A global estimate of declining water storage capacity in large reservoirs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wrcr.20452
- The paper
- Wisser, D., Frolking, S., Hagen, S., & Bierkens, M. F. P. (2013). Beyond peak reservoir storage? A global estimate of declining water storage capacity in large reservoirs. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.