Post‐translational modification: nature's escape from genetic imprisonment and the basis for dynamic information encoding
Open accessAbstract
We discuss protein post‐translational modification (PTM) from an information processing perspective. PTM at multiple sites on a protein creates a combinatorial explosion in the number of potential ‘mod‐forms’, or global patterns of modification. Distinct mod‐forms can elicit distinct downstream responses, so that the overall response depends partly on the effectiveness of a particular mod‐form to elicit a response and partly on the stoichiometry of that mod‐form in the molecular population. We introduce the ‘mod‐form distribution’—the relative stoichiometries of each mod‐form—as the most informative measure of a protein's state. Distinct mod‐form distributions may summarize information about distinct cellular and physiological conditions and allow downstream processes to interpret this information accordingly. Such information ‘encoding’ by PTMs may facilitate evolution by weakening the need to directly link upstream conditions to downstream responses. Mod‐form distributions provide a quantitative framework in which to interpret ideas of ‘PTM codes’ that are emerging in several areas of biology, as we show by reviewing examples of ion channels, GPCRs, microtubules, and transcriptional co‐regulators. We focus particularly on examples other than the well‐known ‘histone code’, to emphasize the pervasive use of information encoding in molecular biology. Finally, we touch briefly on new methods for measuring mod‐form distributions. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2012, 4:565–583. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1185 This article is categorized under: Models of Systems Properties and Processes > Mechanistic Models Laboratory Methods and Technologies > Proteomics Methods Biological Mechanisms > Regulatory Biology
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PTMs offer an escape from the central dogma by accessing a far broader ensemble of protein compositions than can be realized from the genetic level alone.
“One way to think about the role of this complexity is that it offers an 'escape' from the central dogma by accessing a far broader ensemble of protein compositions than can be realized from the genetic level alone 80 .”
From How many human proteoforms are there? (2018) · cites this paper as [80]
This framework is being extended to other PTM marks like phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, etc., and they combine to regulate responses to physiological conditions and to fine-tune individual molecular interactions.
“This framework is being extended to other PTM marks like phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, etc., and they combine to regulate responses to physiological conditions 80 and to fine-tune individual molecular interactions.”
From How many human proteoforms are there? (2018) · cites this paper as [80]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 125 · Cited by 335
- Authors
- Prabakaran, S., Lippens, G., Steen, H., & Gunawardena, J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gunawardena, Jeremy
- Venue
- WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-15
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 565-583
- ISSN
- 1939-005X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5094
- PMC
- PMC3473174
- OpenAlex
- W2107003257
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM081578, R01GM094844)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- post-translational modification, information encoding, stoichiometry, ion channels, G protein-coupled receptors, microtubules, transcriptional coregulators, histone code
- MeSH terms
- Acetylation, Animals, Humans, Ion Channels, Methylation, Microtubules, Phosphorylation, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Transcription Factors, Histone Code, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Ubiquitination, Sumoylation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review