Behavioral sex differences and activity patterns of captive humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti)
Abstract
Three female and two male captive Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti) were observed in an enclosed exhibit over a period of 10 months to examine behavioral sex differences and to establish whether captive Humboldt penguins exhibit behavioral activity patterns. There were no statistically significant differences between the behaviors of males and females in six categories: resting, self‐maintenance, locomoting, lack of visibility, agonistic behaviors, or pair‐directed behaviors. Although not statistically significant, the pair‐directed activities of bowing and ecstatic displaying were found to have potential use for sexual identification. Females bowing to males accounted for 77% of the observed bows. Further, males were observed performing 68% of the observed ecstatic displays, while females performed only 32%. Four behavioral phases were defined: molting, proximity, nesting, and “other.” Statistically significant behavioral differences occurred between the four phases for all ethogram behaviors with the exception of agonistic and pair‐directed behaviors. Although housed under natural daylight and in an exhibit simulating their habitat in the wild, the captive birds failed to demonstrate a breeding season but bred throughout the study. However, this may have been influenced by one or more of the following factors: a ready supply of food; an air‐filtered, temperature‐controlled atmosphere; and the presence of an adequate number of nesting sites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Males in this study displayed more than females.
“Males in this study displayed more than females, showing the opposite pattern to captive Humboldt penguins [50].”
From The Benefits of Increased Space and Habitat Complexity for the Welfare of Zoo-Housed King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) (2023) · cites this paper as [50]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 14 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Merritt, K., & King, N. E.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Zoo (US)
- Corresponding author
- King, Nancy E.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-138
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2043449587
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- Humboldt penguin, sex differences in behavior, activity patterns, captive penguins, ethogram, bowing, molting, nesting, breeding season, zoo animal husbandry, agonistic behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review