Interaction sequences between chimpanzees and human visitors at the Zoo
Abstract
Data were collected on the behavior and physical characteristics of 259 human visitors and 24 chimpanzees at Chester Zoo. The successive responses of humans and chimpanzees to each other's behavior were recorded, the resulting long sequence being referred to as an interaction sequence. There was no particular set of characteristics that distinguished interactors from noninteractors in either humans or chimpanzees, although there was some evidence that chimpanzees were particularly likely to respond to men carrying objects. Chimpanzee responses were random with respect to the previous human behavior, but human responses were significantly associated with the preceding chimpanzee behavior. In particular, chimpanzee sounds were likely to be followed by human sounds, and begging was likely to be followed by the offer of food. Interaction sequences varied in length, but 9% of chimpanzee‐initiated sequences went as far as a ninth interaction. Sequences resulted in the chimpanzees being given food in 25% of human‐initiated, but only 8% of chimpanzee‐initiated sequences. The results are consistent with the interpretation that humans and chimpanzees are motivated to interact with one another and that the chimpanzees do this primarily to obtain food. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chimpanzees at Chester Zoo initiated interaction with visitors, particularly if soliciting food.
“chimpanzees at Chester Zoo initiated interaction with visitors, particularly if soliciting food [107].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [107]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Cook, S., & Hosey, G. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Greater Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hosey, G. R.
- ORCID
- Hosey, G. R.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 431-440
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2032323729
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- North of England Zoological Society
- Chester Zoo
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- chimpanzees, zoo visitors, interaction sequences, food exchange, vocalizations, zoo animal behavior, animal welfare, Chester Zoo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review