Elephant importation from range countries: ethical and practical considerations for accredited zoos
Abstract
Zoo elephant populations are in serious demographic peril. Advances in elephant management and care are expected to lead to improved reproductive success. The existing cohort of reproductively viable adult females is aging, however, and effective changes may not come fast enough to sustain the population over time. If so, importation of captive, semi‐domesticated, and wild elephants from range countries may be necessary for zoo programs to survive. Yet, due to the high profile elephants now have with animal rights activists, there may be increasing legal and political barriers to elephant importation. This makes it especially important that zoos become more proactive in addressing remaining weaknesses in elephant management and care and building the case for elephants in zoos. This article summarizes the key considerations for AZA‐accredited zoos that are contemplating future importations. These include ethical, legal, practical, public relations, and other considerations. The authors strongly recommend that zoos position themselves for possible future importations immediately instead of waiting until the last minute. It is equally critical that zoos recognize their existing vulnerabilities and attempt to address them proactively; only then, can they take control of their own fate and reduce the potential for later regret. Zoo Biol 25:219–233, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The elephant population in zoos is generally not sustainable without imports from the wild.
“The elephant population in zoos is generally not sustainable without imports from the wild (Wiese, 2000;Hutchins & Keele, 2006;Mar, Lahdenperä & Lummaa, 2012;Kurt, 2014) due to the poor reproductive success and low survivorship of captive elephants, who suffer from a reduced median lifespan as well as a higher mortality rate than their free-ranging and semi-captive counterparts (Clubb et al., 2009”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Hutchins & Keele, 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Hutchins, M., & Keele, M.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Oregon Zoo (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hutchins, Michael
- ORCID
- Hutchins, Michael
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-233
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2022292288
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- zoo elephants, Association of Zoos and Aquariums, ethical considerations, legal barriers, public relations, animal rights activism, wild elephants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review