Cited by 18Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Elephant importation from range countries: ethical and practical considerations for accredited zoos

Hutchins, Michael, Keele, Mike·2006·Zoo Biology

Abstract

Zoo elephant populations are in serious demographic peril. Advances in elephant management and care are expected to lead to improved reproductive success. The existing cohort of reproductively viable adult females is aging, however, and effective changes may not come fast enough to sustain the population over time. If so, importation of captive, semi‐domesticated, and wild elephants from range countries may be necessary for zoo programs to survive. Yet, due to the high profile elephants now have with animal rights activists, there may be increasing legal and political barriers to elephant importation. This makes it especially important that zoos become more proactive in addressing remaining weaknesses in elephant management and care and building the case for elephants in zoos. This article summarizes the key considerations for AZA‐accredited zoos that are contemplating future importations. These include ethical, legal, practical, public relations, and other considerations. The authors strongly recommend that zoos position themselves for possible future importations immediately instead of waiting until the last minute. It is equally critical that zoos recognize their existing vulnerabilities and attempt to address them proactively; only then, can they take control of their own fate and reduce the potential for later regret. Zoo Biol 25:219–233, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.20102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The elephant population in zoos is generally not sustainable without imports from the wild.

    “The elephant population in zoos is generally not sustainable without imports from the wild (Wiese, 2000;Hutchins & Keele, 2006;Mar, Lahdenperä & Lummaa, 2012;Kurt, 2014) due to the poor reproductive success and low survivorship of captive elephants, who suffer from a reduced median lifespan as well as a higher mortality rate than their free-ranging and semi-captive counterparts (Clubb et al., 2009”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 18

Authors
Hutchins, M., & Keele, M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Oregon Zoo (US)
Corresponding author
Hutchins, Michael
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
219-233
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W2022292288
Cited by
18
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
zoo elephants, Association of Zoos and Aquariums, ethical considerations, legal barriers, public relations, animal rights activism, wild elephants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review