Postoccupancy evaluations in zoological settings
Abstract
A postoccupancy evaluation (POE) is a systematic assessment performed to examine the effectiveness of the built environment after occupation. Although POEs have been mainly used to examine the effectiveness of built environments for human usage, they can and should be adapted for use in zoological settings. Zoological exhibits have evolved from when hygiene concerns ruled design to current trends that involve elaborate exhibits that often cost millions of dollars. Thus, it is imperative to conduct evaluations to ensure that these exhibits function to meet the complex needs of all users. It is crucial to perform a comprehensive POE that focuses on all three user groups; animals, visitors, and staff. However, work in this field is limited. Animal research has tended to remain very primate-focused with differing opinions as to what constitutes optimal outcomes. Zoo visitor studies often have limited scope and differing methodologies. Additionally, research on zoo staff opinions and feedback is almost nonexistent. A new exhibit opening at a zoo has huge potential for improving the welfare of the animals it will house, enhancing the zoo visitor experience, and improving the workplace for zoo personnel. Building the best possible exhibits requires not only the analysis of how the built environment affects all three groups, but also dissemination of those findings to guide future design.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assessing enclosure suitability requires consideration of the species' natural habitat, ecology and behavior, to ensure psychological and physiological needs are met.
“This requires consideration of the species' natural habitat, ecology and behavior, to ensure that their psychological and physiological needs are met (Hancocks, 2010; Kelling and Gaalema, 2011).”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Kelling and Gaalema, 2011
Use of behavioral indicators of welfare has increased to determine psychological and physiological well-being.
“Consequently, use of behavioral indicators of welfare has increased to determine psychological and physiological well-being (Hancocks, 2010; Kelling and Gaalema, 2011).”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Kelling and Gaalema, 2011
POEs remain relatively rare in the scientific literature, with existing studies showing a taxonomic bias towards mammals.
“In spite of their great potential to inform exhibit design, POEs remain relatively rare in the scientific literature, with existing studies showing a taxonomic bias towards mammals [1].”
From The Benefits of Increased Space and Habitat Complexity for the Welfare of Zoo-Housed King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Kelling, A. S., & Gaalema, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelling, Angela S.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-23
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 597-610
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2066782033
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Georgia Institute of Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Keywords
- post-occupancy evaluation, zoo design, animal welfare, zoo visitors, zoo staff, built environment, exhibition design, zoo visitor experience
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Zoo, Facility Design and Construction, Housing, Animal, Research Design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review