Achieving true sustainability of zoo populations
Abstract
For the last 30 years, cooperative management of irreplaceable animal populations in zoos and aquariums has focused primarily on the goal of minimizing genetic decay within defined time frames, and large advances have been made in technologies to optimize genetic management of closed populations. However, recent analyses have shown that most zoo programs are not projected to meet their stated goals. This has been described as a lack of achieving "sustainability" of the populations, yet by definition a goal of managed decay is not a plan for sustainability. True sustainability requires management of the resource in manner that does not deplete its value for the future. Achieving such sustainability for many managed populations may require changing from managing isolated populations to managing populations that are part of a broader metapopulation, with carefully considered exchange between populations across a spectrum of ex situ to in situ. Managing zoo populations as components of comprehensive conservation strategies for the species will require research on determinants of various kinds of genetic, physiological, behavioral, and morphological variation and their roles in population viability, development of an array of management techniques and tools, training of population managers in metapopulation management and integrated conservation planning, and projections of impacts of management strategies on the viability of the captive populations and all populations that are in…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The aims of contraception in managed breeding include managing genetic composition, reducing inbreeding, and modifying generation length.
“The aims of contraception are variable: to manage the population's genetic composition, reduce inbreeding, and modify generation length as the primary concerns [15].”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wildlife Conservation: Is Domestication a Solution?
Teletchea, F. (2017) · Global Exposition of Wildlife Management · doi:10.5772/65660 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Norman, M., & Brando, S. (2024) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg5040038 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The aims of contraception are variable: to manage the population’s genetic composition, reduce inbreeding, and modify generation length as the primary concerns [15].”
- Authors
- Lacy*, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Chicago Zoological Society Brookfield Illinois
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-26
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2098683313
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 34.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- genetic management, metapopulation management, population viability, ex situ conservation, in situ conservation, species conservation, population exchange
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animals, Zoo, Conservation of Natural Resources, Genetics, Population, Research, Genetic Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review