Cited by 56Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyTurtle Biology and Conservation

Is preference a predictor of enrichment efficacy in Galapagos tortoises (Chelonoidis nigra)?

Mehrkam, Lindsay R., Dorey, Nicole R.·2014·Zoo Biology

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that environmental enrichment plays an important role in promoting the welfare of captive animals. However, a topic of debate is whether an animal's preference for an enrichment strategy is any indicator of its efficacy. In addition, relatively few studies have evaluated environmental enrichment strategies for non-mammalian species. In the present study, we compared the results of an observational evaluation of enrichment efficacy with the results of a paired-stimulus preference assessment for three Galapagos tortoises. In the observational study, object enrichment (boomer balls and a free-flowing sprinkler) and keeper interactions (shell scrubbing and neck rubbing) were evaluated systematically for their effects on locomotion, species-typical behavior, aggressive and non-aggressive conspecific interactions, and enclosure. Preference assessments were subsequently conducted in which subjects could choose the enrichment strategy to be implemented. All subjects preferred keeper interactions consistently over object enrichment. Our results suggest that enrichment preference was a variable predictor of efficacy across enrichment species-typical behavior, activity levels, enclosure use, and aggressive and non-aggressive conspecific interactions strategies. Preference predicted efficacy for promoting species-typical behavior (1/3 subjects), activity levels (2/3 subjects), and enclosure use (2/3 subjects), but not conspecific interactions (0/3 subjects). The…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.21151

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehrkam, L. R., & Dorey, N. R.
Affiliations
  • Santa Fe College (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Mehrkam, Lindsay R.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
275-284
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W1851357897
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
Keywords
environmental enrichment, animal preferences, Galápagos tortoise, Chelonoidis nigra, captive animal welfare, species-typical behavior, activity level, enclosure use, paired-stimulus preference assessment
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Female, Male, Social Behavior, Species Specificity, Turtles, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review