Reactions of female cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) to urine volatiles from males of varying genetic distance
Abstract
Understanding the factors used by female cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) to make mate choice decisions could benefit zoo breeding programs, which currently assign mates based primarily on genetic distance. Because transporting animals between institutions is costly and can be stressful, females are often limited in the number of males available for mating. One solution would be to determine if an easily transported substance could be used to gauge interest by a female to a potential mate. Here, we investigate female interest in urine samples from males of different genetic distances. Twelve females at five institutions were offered scents from 17 males of varying genetic relatedness in a pair-wise choice paradigm. Behavioral responses of the females were recorded to determine preference. Results showed that females spent more time sniffing and in proximity to scents from the most distantly related males, but female response was not influenced by male urine testosterone concentration, female parity, age, or estrous cycling. Further research will be necessary to determine whether a female's interest in male urine translates to mate preference and acceptance before this technique can be applied to zoo breeding programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female cheetahs reliably demonstrated a scent preference for males most genetically distant from themselves.
“The females reliably demonstrated a scent preference for males most genetically distant from themselves [47].”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In practical experiments, several species experienced greater pair and reproductive success when paired with males they demonstrated a scent preference for.
“In practical experiments using this method several species, including stripe-faced dunnart [23], cheetah [47], and harvest mouse (Micromys minutus [48]), experienced greater pair and reproductive success when paired with the males they demonstrated a scent preference for.”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Norman, M., & Brando, S. (2024) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg5040038 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The females reliably demonstrated a scent preference for males most genetically distant from themselves [47].”
- Authors
- Mossotti, R. H., Baskir, E. A., Kozlowski, C. P., Franklin, A. D., Feldhamer, G. A., & Asa, C. S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Animal Care and Conservation Endangered Wolf Center Eureka Missouri
- Saint Louis Zoo (US)
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baskir, Eli A.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-13
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 229-235
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2808230439
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Southern Illinois University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- cheetah, mate choice, female mate preference, genetic distance, scent marking, zoo breeding, testosterone, estrous cycle, olfactory communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review