Cited by 8Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The utility of social network analysis for informing zoo management: Changing network dynamics of a group of captive hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) following an introduction of two young males

Radosevich, Louisa M., Jaffe, Karin Enstam, Minier, Darren E.·2021·Zoo Biology

Abstract

Comprehensive knowledge of social groups within zoos allows for better understanding of the issues surrounding group stability and how to provide captive animals with optimal care. A developing area of sociality research that works to improve this understanding is social network analysis (SNA), which allows scientists to apply quantitative measures of group systems to represent social structure. In December 2015, Oakland Zoo introduced two new males to the hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas) exhibit. We examined the changing group structure of these baboons over the course of 6 months (July-December 2016) using social network analysis, specifically focusing on the changing social structure of the existing group and the utility of SNA methods for optimal care of captive animals. This study found that over time, the new males decreased their overall individual centrality, while some individuals had an increase in betweenness, a measure of an individual's intermediary role in the network. The results also illustrate the utility of social network analysis as tool for zoo management to examine how husbandry may have an impact on their animals, specifically for social species. Further research on the social networks of hamadryas baboon multi-clan formation could provide more information about the societal structure of this primate species, as well as the use of social network analysis as a valuable tool in captive animal management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.21630

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radosevich, L. M., Jaffe, K. E., & Minier, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Sonoma State University (US)
  • Animal Care, Conservation, and Research Conservation Society of California–Oakland Zoo Oakland California USA
Corresponding author
Radosevich, Louisa M.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-18
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
503-516
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W3169776452
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
social network analysis, hamadryas baboon, Papio hamadryas, zoo management, group stability, betweenness centrality, husbandry, social species
MeSH terms
Social Network Analysis, Social Structure, Animals, Animals, Zoo, Male, Social Behavior, Papio hamadryas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review