The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competition BIAcore for Measuring True Affinities: Large Differences from Values Determined from Binding Kinetics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibody arrays for high-throughput screening of antibody–antigen interactions
de Wildt, R. M. T., Mundy, C. R., Gorick, B. D., & Tomlinson, I. M. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/79494 · Cited by 624
McDonnell, J. M. (2001) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(00)00251-9 · Cited by 594
CD80 (B7-1) Binds Both CD28 and CTLA-4 with a Low Affinity and Very Fast Kinetics
van der Merwe, P. A., Bodian, D. L., Daenke, S., Linsley, P., & Davis, S. J. (1997) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.185.3.393 · Cited by 551
Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors
Myszka, D. G. (1997) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(97)80157-7 · Cited by 552
The Periplasmic Escherichia coli Peptidylprolyl cis,trans-Isomerase FkpA
Bothmann, H., & Plückthun, A. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m910233199 · Cited by 192
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nieba, L., Krebber, A., & Plückthun, A.
- Venue
- Analytical Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 234
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-165
- ISSN
- 0003-2697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137228190
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition BIAcore for Measuring True Affinities: Large Differences from Values Determined from Binding Kinetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/abio.1996.0067
- The paper
- Nieba, L., Krebber, A., & Plückthun, A. (1996). Competition BIAcore for Measuring True Affinities: Large Differences from Values Determined from Binding Kinetics. Analytical Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
