The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uncertainty in the reconstruction of ancestral character states and limitations on the use of phylogenetic comparative methods
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the ability to assess confidence in such reconstructions is an important advantage of model-based reconstruction methods, such as maximum likelihood, over methods like parsimony which simply generate a point estimate (Losos 1999).”
From How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology (2012) · cites this paper as Losos 1999
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
Harvey, P., & Pagel, M. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5104 · Cited by 4,778
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts
Garland, T., Harvey, P. H., & Ives, A. R. (1992) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · Cited by 2,151
Martins, E. P., & Hansen, T. F. (1997) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/286013 · Cited by 1,718
LIKELIHOOD OF ANCESTOR STATES IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION
Schluter, D., Price, T. D., Mooers, A. Ø., & Ludwig, D. (1997) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05095.x · Cited by 936
Ecological morphology: Integrative organismal biology
Sinervo, B. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89062-x · Cited by 909
Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior. A Research Program in Comparative Biology
Crother, B. I., Brooks, D. R., & McLennan, D. A. (1991) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1446122 · Cited by 798
Cheverud, J. M., Dow, M. M., & Leutenegger, W. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05699.x · Cited by 671
Garland, T., Midford, P. E., & Ives, A. R. (1999) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/39.2.374 · Cited by 568
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lorenz, 1941, Vergleichende Bewegungsstudien an Anatinen, Journal of Ornithology, 89, 24
Cited by
Sorted by citations
TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x · Cited by 4,678
Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence
Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. (2002) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/343873 · Cited by 2,604
Losos, J. B. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x · Cited by 1,735
Self-citationTESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0717:tfpsic]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 994
Social complexity as a proximate and ultimate factor in communicative complexity
Freeberg, T. M., Dunbar, R., & Ord, T. J. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0213 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Losos, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Losos, Jonathan B.
- ORCID
- Losos, Jonathan B.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1319-1324
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117660161
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Keywords
- ancestral state reconstruction, phylogenetic comparative analysis, uncertainty, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, core genes, false positive rate, microbial taxonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review