The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized procrustes analysis
Gower, J. C. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291478 · Cited by 3,267
From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?
Gosling, S. D. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.1.45 · Cited by 1,695
A GENERAL PSYCHOEVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF EMOTION
PLUTCHIK, R. (1980) · Theories of Emotion · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7 · Cited by 1,370
Emotion: Theory, Research and Experience
Hughes, C. W. (1982) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198205000-00017 · Cited by 967
Consciousness Explained?: A Commentary on Dennett's Consciousness Explained
Rakover, S. S., & Binghamton University (1994) · International Studies in Philosophy · doi:10.5840/intstudphil1994262128 · Cited by 853
Fear and Fearfulness in Animals
Boissy, A. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418981 · Cited by 747
Primate Social Relationships: an Integrated Approach
Hinde, R. A. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 580
EMOTION: Theory, Research, and Experience
(1980) · Theories of Emotion · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-558701-3.50001-6 · Cited by 422
Kennedy, J. S. (1992) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623455 · Cited by 402
McFarland, D. J. (1977) · Nature · doi:10.1038/269015a0 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare
Boissy, A., Manteuffel, G., Jensen, M. B., Moe, R. O., Spruijt, B., Keeling, L. J., Winckler, C., Forkman, B., Dimitrov, I., Langbein, J., et al. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003 · Cited by 1,486
Fish welfare: Current issues in aquaculture
Ashley, P. J. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.001 · Cited by 1,074
Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review
Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Pedersen, V., Tosi, M.-V., Janczak, A. M., Visser, E. K., & Jones, R. B. (2006) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001 · Cited by 751
Resilience in farm animals: biology, management, breeding and implications for animal welfare
Colditz, I. G., & Hine, B. C. (2016) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an15297 · Cited by 388
Extending ideas about animal welfare assessment to include ‘quality of life’ and related concepts
Green, T., & Mellor, D. (2011) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2011.610283 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Wemelsfelder, F., Hunter, T. E. A., Mendl, M. T., & Lawrence, A. B.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-220
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077780180
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbe.2001.1741
- The paper
- Wemelsfelder, F., Hunter, T. E. A., Mendl, M. T., & Lawrence, A. B. (2001). Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach. Animal Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
