Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Resource Capture by Localized Root Proliferation: Why Do Plants Bother?

ROBINSON, D·1996·Annals of Botany

Abstract

Using data from a well-known, published experiment [Drew (1975) The New Phytologist75 : 479–490], the potential exploitation of locally available nutrients by barley roots is calculated. Local proliferation of lateral roots does not necessarily achieve significantly greater exploitation of mobile soil resources like nitrate, but it does for less mobile ones such as phosphate. Despite this, the magnitude of the proliferative response is as great to locally available nitrate as it is to phosphate. This implies an ‘over-production’ of roots in response to localized nitrate availability, prompting a re-evaluation of the nature and implications of the response mechanism(s) of roots to soil heterogeneity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/anbo.1996.0020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
ROBINSON, D.
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
1996-02
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
179-186
ISSN
0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096443168
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resource Capture by Localized Root Proliferation: Why Do Plants Bother? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbo.1996.0020
The paper
ROBINSON, D. (1996). Resource Capture by Localized Root Proliferation: Why Do Plants Bother? Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.