The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anatomical Features of Pepper Plants (Capsicum annuumL.) Grown under Red Light-emitting Diodes Supplemented with Blue or Far-red Light
Open accessAbstract
Pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L. cv., Hungarian Wax) were grown under metal halide (MH) lamps or light-emitting diode (LED) arrays with different spectra to determine the effects of light quality on plant anatomy of leaves and stems. One LED (660) array supplied 90% red light at 660 nm (25nm band-width at half-peak height) and 1% far-red light between 700-800nm. A second LED (660/735) array supplied 83% red light at 660nm and 17% far-red light at 735nm (25nm band-width at half-peak height). A third LED (660/blue) array supplied 98% red light at 660nm, 1% blue light between 350-550nm, and 1% far-red light between 700-800nm. Control plants were grown under broad spectrum metal halide lamps. Plants were gron at a mean photon flux (300-800nm) of 330 micromol m-2 s-1 under a 12 h day-night photoperiod. Significant anatomical changes in stem and leaf morphologies were observed in plants grown under the LED arrays compared to plants grown under the broad-spectrum MH lamp. Cross-sectional areas of pepper stems, thickness of secondary xylem, numbers of intraxylary phloem bundles in the periphery of stem pith tissues, leaf thickness, numbers of choloplasts per palisade mesophyll cell, and thickness of palisade and spongy mesophyll tissues were greatest in peppers grown under MH lamps, intermediate in plants grown under the 660/blue LED array, and lowest in peppers grown under the 660 or 660/735 LED arrays. Most anatomical features of pepper stems and leaves were similar among plants grown under 660 or 660/735 LED arrays. The effects of spectral quality on anatomical changes in stem and leaf tissues of peppers generally correlate to the amount of blue light present in the primary light source.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants
Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826 · cited 6×
“Leaf thinning under shaded conditions appears to be a general phenomenon in many dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants (Hanson, 1917; Boardman, 1977; Louwerse and Zweede, 1977).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Paradiso, R., & Proietti, S. (2022) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-021-10337-y · Cited by 601
Yeh, N., & Chung, J.-P. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.01.027 · Cited by 555
Kim, S.-J., Hahn, E.-J., Heo, J.-W., & Paek, K.-Y. (2004) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2003.10.003 · Cited by 447
Effect of red-and blue-light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of grapes
Poudel, P. R., Kataoka, I., & Mochioka, R. (2008) · Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture · doi:10.1007/s11240-007-9317-1 · Cited by 294
Wang, H., Gu, M., Cui, J., Shi, K., Zhou, Y., & Yu, J. (2009) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.03.010 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHUERGER, A.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-282
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075510117
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomical Features of Pepper Plants (Capsicum annuumL.) Grown under Red Light-emitting Diodes Supplemented with Blue or Far-red Light. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbo.1996.0341
- The paper
- SCHUERGER, A. (1997). Anatomical Features of Pepper Plants (Capsicum annuumL.) Grown under Red Light-emitting Diodes Supplemented with Blue or Far-red Light. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.