The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nuclear DNA Amounts in Roses
Abstract
Nuclei isolated from young leaves were stained with propidium iodide (PI) and their fluorescence intensities were measured by flow cytometry. The ratio of fluorescence intensities of four calibration standards and 34 roses to an internal standard, parsley ( Petroselinum crispum ), provided a basis for estimating the DNA amounts of P. crispum and rose. The 2C DNA amount of P. crispum (2 n = 22) was estimated as 4.46 pg (s.d. ± 0.08 pg). The 2C DNA amounts of diploid roses (2 n = 14) varied between subgenera, sections and cultivars, and ranged from 0.78 pg (s.d. ± 0.08 pg) in Rosa xanthina and R. sericea (section Pimpinellifoliae) to 1.29 pg (s.d. ± 0.08 pg) in ‘Félicité et Perpétue’ (Hybrid Sempervirens). Within each section, the DNA amounts of diploid species were similar. In the sections Carolinae and Cinnamomeae, DNA amounts were proportional to ploidy numbers. In the Pimpinellifoliae, DNA amounts of tetraploids were disproportionately larger than those of diploids which suggests that they originated as hybrids with species of sections with larger DNA amounts. Ratios of the fluorescence intensities of nuclei of roses to P. crispum (internal standard) were also measured using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) which binds preferentially to AT base pairs. These DAPI ratios were lower than, but closely correlated ( r2 = 0.997) with PI ratios. Fluorescence intensities of either PI or DAPI-stained nuclei of roses can be used as rapid indicators of ploidy if variation in the DN…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The peaks with a coefficient of variation of less than 5% were accepted.
“The peaks with a coefficient of variation of less than 5% were accepted and the nuclear genome size of each type of plant material was estimated according to Yokoya et al. (2000).”
From Evaluation of genetic stability in olive callus-induced and meristem-induced shoots using flow cytometry and amplified fragment length polymorphism techniques (2021) · cites this paper as Yokoya et al. (2000)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mirzaei, L., Yadollahi, A., Kermani, M. J., Naderpour, M., Zeinanloo, A. A., Farsi, M., & Davoodi, D. (2021) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-021-00724-7 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Yokoya, K.
- Affiliations
- University of East London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Yokoya, K
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 557-561
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117824005
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Keywords
- Rosa, nuclear DNA content, ploidy, flow cytometry, propidium iodide staining, DAPI staining, diploids, tetraploid, hybrid origin, Rosa xanthina, Rosa sericea
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review