The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution and Function of Leaf Venation Architecture: A Review
Abstract
The leaves of extant terrestrial plants show highly diverse and elaborate patterns of leaf venation. One fundamental feature of many leaf venation patterns, especially in the case of angiosperm leaves, is the presence of anastomoses. Anastomosing veins distinguish a network topologically from a simple dendritic (tree-like) pattern which represents the primitive venation architecture. The high degree of interspecific variation of entire venation patterns as well as phenotypic plasticity of some venation properties, such as venation density, indicate the high selective pressure acting on this branching system. Few investigations deal with functional properties of the leaf venation system. The interrelationships between topological or geometric properties of the various leaf venation patterns and functional aspects are far from being well understood. In this review we summarize current knowledge of interrelationships between the form and function of leaf venation and the evolution of leaf venation patterns. Since the functional aspects of architectural features of different leaf venation patterns are considered, the review also refers to the topic of individual and intraspecific variation. One basic function of leaf venation is represented by its contribution to the mechanical behaviour of a leaf. Venation geometry and density influences mechanical stability and may affect, for example, susceptibility to herbivory. Transport of water and carbohydrates is the other basic function of this system and the transport properties are also influenced by the venation architecture. These various functional aspects can be interpreted in an ecophysiological context. Copyright 2001 Annals of Botany Company
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Applied Mathematics
Strang, G., & Freund, L. B. (1986) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.3171799 · Cited by 664
Cited by
Sack, L., & Holbrook, N. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144141 · Cited by 932
Sack, L., & Scoffoni, C. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12253 · Cited by 830
Photorespiration and the Evolution of C4Photosynthesis
Sage, R. F., Sage, T. L., & Kocacinar, F. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105511 · Cited by 759
Corrigendum to : New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide
Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Díaz, S., Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Poorter, H., Jaureguiberry, P., Bret-Harte, M. S., Cornwell, W. K., Craine, J. M., Gurvich, D. E., et al. (2016) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt12225_co · Cited by 759
LEAF STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY IS RELATED TO HYDRAULIC CAPACITY IN TROPICAL RAIN FOREST TREES
Sack, L., & Frole, K. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/05-0710 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Roth-Nebelsick, A.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 553-566
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151217944
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution and Function of Leaf Venation Architecture: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbo.2001.1391
- The paper
- Roth-Nebelsick, A. (2001). Evolution and Function of Leaf Venation Architecture: A Review. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.