On Galilei Invariance in Quantum Mechanics and the Bargmann Superselection Rule
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We do not know exactly how to handle mass in quantum mechanics and how to construct mass superposition states.
“since we do not know exactly how to handle the mass in quantum mechanics and how to construct mass superposition states [7, 17, 18].”
From Equivalence principle and quantum mechanics: quantum simulation with entangled photons (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
The Introduction (pp. 1–2) says ordinary quantum mechanics treats masses as fixed parameters, making the usual account of superpositions of different masses difficult to interpret. But the paper also presents an extended model with dynamical masses (Section 2, p. 9), so it does not support an unqualified assertion that we do not know how to handle mass or construct such states. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn nonrelativistic quantum mechanics mass is a kinematical parameter and superposition states of different masses are conceptually unclear.
“in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics mass is a kinematical parameter and superposition states are conceptually unclear states [7,18]”
From Equivalence principle and quantum mechanics: quantum simulation with entangled photons (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
The main caveat underlying derivation of Bargmann's superselection rule is that it imposes restrictions on a kinematical level for states that, on the dynamical level, we would not know exactly how to handle.
“The main caveat underling derivation of Bargmann's superselection rule is that it imposes restrictions on a kinematical level for states that, on the dynamical level, we would not know exactly how to handle [7, 18]”
From Equivalence principle and quantum mechanics: quantum simulation with entangled photons (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
On Unitary Ray Representations of Continuous Groups
Bargmann, V. (1954) · The Annals of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/1969831 · Cited by 954 · cited 4× · see citing works
“This is done not for a free particle [1-6] but in the more 1 In field theory such an additional input is, for example, given by the principle of locality.”
BackgroundInfluentialGalilei Group and Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics
Lévy-Leblond, J. (1963) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1724319 · Cited by 211 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This is done not for a free particle [1-6] but in the more 1 In field theory such an additional input is, for example, given by the principle of locality.”
BackgroundGalindo, A., & Pascual, P. (1990) · doi:10.1142/9789812703569_0001 · Cited by 164
Superselection rules; old and new
Wightman, A. S. (1995) · Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B · doi:10.1007/bf02741478 · Cited by 114 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It seems to be a generally accepted text-book wisdom that non-relativistic quantum mechanics has superselection rules for the total mass M [1-7].”
BackgroundSymmetries, superselection rules, and decoherence
Giulini, D., Kiefer, C., & Zeh, H. D. (1995) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(95)00128-p · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similar views were also expressed in [12].”
Self-citationA Remark on Machida-Namiki Theory of Measurement
Araki, H. (1980) · doi:10.1143/ptp.64.719 · Cited by 60 · cited 1×
“tructive to compare the situation to ordinary quantum mechanics in a translation invariant context. In the latter case, 9 For some background material on continuous superselection rules, see e.g. [10][11]. 12 translation invariance is not interpreted to generally prevent us from forming superpositions of plane waves w…”
BackgroundRaghunathan, M. (1994) · doi:10.1142/s0129055x94000110 · Cited by 15 · cited 2×
“Equivalently [9], we can have a proper representation of a slightly larger group, the so-called extended Galilei group Ḡ, which is a central extension of G by a group Z isomorphic to R(4) This means that all of Z lies in the centre of Ḡ and that the quotient group Ḡ/Z is isomorphic to G.”
BackgroundSymmetries and Quantization:. Structure of the State Space
Divakaran, P. (1994) · doi:10.1142/s0129055x94000109 · Cited by 7 · cited 1×
“ervables to acquire a non-trivial centre. 2 Sometimes purely kinematical symmetry groups are invoked in the definition of quantum mechanical state spaces, before any dynamical laws are given. See e.g. [8]. This should be distinguished from the dynamical notion of symmetry used here. 2 general context of nspinless parti…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3][3] F.A. Kaempffer, Concepts in Quantum Mechanics, App. 7. Academeic Press, New York - London 1965 -
- [5][5] H. Primas, Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism, § 3.3, second corrected edition. Springer Verlag, Berlin - Heidelberg 1983 -
- [10][10] C. Piron, Les R` egles de Supers´ election Continues. Helv. Phys. Acta , 42 (1969), 330-338 -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phenomenology of local scale invariance: from conformal invariance to dynamical scaling
Henkel, M. (2002) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00540-0 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Schrödinger invariance and spacetime symmetries
Henkel, M., & Unterberger, J. M. (2003) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(03)00252-9 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Local Scale Invariance and Strongly Anisotropic Equilibrium Critical Systems
Henkel, M. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.1940 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Gravitationally induced inhibitions of dispersion according to the Schrödinger–Newton equation
Giulini, D., & Großardt, A. (2011) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/19/195026 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“nsformation of a scalar function on spacetime under the diffeomorphism ˝ g. The g-dependent phase function : R4 !R is determined up to spacetime independent additions. A convenient choice is (compare [3]) g(t;~x) = m ~ h ~v(~x ~a) 1 2 ~v 2(t b) i : (9) It is immediate that the self-interaction term in (1) and (4) does…”
BackgroundSelf-citationTime dilation in quantum systems and decoherence
Pikovski, I., Zych, M., Costa, F., & Brukner, Č. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa5d92 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Superselection Rules for Philosophers
Earman, J. (2008) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-008-9124-z · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Two-time autocorrelation function in phase-ordering kinetics from local scale invariance
Henkel, M., Picone, A., & Pleimling, M. (2004) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/epl/i2004-10180-y · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Eisenhart lifts and symmetries of time-dependent systems
Cariglia, M., Duval, C., Gibbons, G. W., et al. (2016) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.07.033 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“From the point of view of non-relativistic quantum mechanics in the lower dimensional Newton-Cartan spacetime we have an example of the much discussed fact [42] that the mass in non-relativistic quantum mechanics may be used to label super-selection sectors.”
BackgroundNumerical tests of local scale invariance in ageing q-state Potts models
Lorenz, E., & Janke, W. (2007) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/77/10003 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Galilei covariance and Einstein's equivalence principle in quantum reference frames
Pereira, S. T., & Angelo, R. M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022107 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Dynamical symmetries of semi-linear Schrödinger and diffusion equations
Stoimenov, S., & Henkel, M. (2005) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.06.017 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Algebraic and Geometric Structures in Special Relativity
Giulini, D. (2006) · Lecture notes in physics · doi:10.1007/3-540-34523-x_4 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“There are certain analogs of this on the classical lev e ; see [24].”
BackgroundSelf-citationPadmanabhan, H., & Padmanabhan, Τ. (2011) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.085018 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Cinti, E., Corti, A., & Sanchioni, M. (2022) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00439-5 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Quantum Theory in Accelerated Frames of Reference
Mashhoon, B. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-34523-x_5 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Dynamical Symmetries and Causality in Non-Equilibrium Phase Transitions
Henkel, M. (2015) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym7042108 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“The new dual coordinate ζ is related to either the scalar mass M for the Schrödinger algebra (this fact was first noted by Giulini [18] for the Galilei algebra) or else to the vector of the rapidities γ for the conformal Galilei algebra.”
BackgroundSchrödinger Symmetry: A Historical Review
Duval, C., Henkel, M., Horváthy, P. A., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-024-05673-0 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“34 Thedualisationidea[138]hasanotherapplication:byworkingoutthe n -pointfunctionindualspace,before back-transforming, the n -point functions can be shown to obey causality and therefore must be interpreted as response functions and not as correlators [104, 140].”
Logarithmic correlators in nonrelativistic conformal field theory
Hosseiny, A., & Rouhani, S. (2010) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3482008 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“In this paper we have shown that logarithmic terms may also appear in the NRCFT’s.”
BackgroundInfluentialIliev, B. Z. (2001) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/23/308 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Relative subsystems and quantum reference frame transformations
Castro-Ruiz, E., & Oreshkov, O. (2025) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02036-x · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“In order to apply our framework, we consider the central extension of the Galilei group, ~ G (see, for example, 66,67 ).”
Quantum Theory in Accelerated Frames of Reference
Mashhoon, B. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Superselection rule for the cosmological constant in three-dimensional spacetime
Bunster, C., & Pérez, A. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.024029 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“See [5] for elaborations on this simple procedure.”
MethodCentre of mass decoherence due to time dilation: paradoxical frame-dependence
Diósi, L. (2017) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/880/1/012020 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Giulini, D. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43573-2_4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom Bargmann’s Superselection Rule to Quantum Newtonian Spacetime
Hernández-Coronado, H. (2012) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-012-9673-5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“And in terms of the Fourier transform φ̃m, the previous equation coincides with the equation defined by Giulini [11].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCausality from Dynamical Symmetry: An Example from Local Scale-Invariance
Henkel, M. (2014) · Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55361-5_30 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Relativistic Unruh-DeWitt detectors with quantized center of mass
Gale, E. P. G., & Zych, M. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.056023 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Physical Ageing and New Representations of Some Lie Algebras of Local Scale-Invariance
Henkel, M., & Stoimenov, S. (2014) · Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55285-7_4 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Logarithmic correlators or responses in non-relativistic analogues of conformal invariance
Henkel, M., & Rouhani, S. (2013) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/49/494004 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Quantized mass-energy effects in an Unruh-DeWitt detector
Wood, C. E., & Zych, M. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.025012 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“(3) is the central extension of the Galilei group [39, 40].”
BackgroundDecoherence: A Dynamical Approach to Superselection Rules?
Giulini, D. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-45369-5_4 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationAutocorrelation functions in phase-ordering kinetics from local scale invariance
Henkel, M., & Baumann, F. (2007) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2007/07/p07015 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Quantum equivalence principle without mass superselection
Hernandez-Coronado, H., & Okon, E. (2013) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2013.07.006 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“How could it be that the equivalence principle, a cardinal tenet of modern physics, turns out to depend on a seemingly contingent rule? A rule which can only be considered as approximate since it lacks a relativistic counterpart (see [20])? Moreover, the imposition of the SSR itself is questionable because, as Giulini…”
BackgroundEquivalence principle and quantum mechanics: quantum simulation with entangled photons
Longhi, S. (2018) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.43.000226 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“n caveat underling derivation of Bargmann‘s superselection rule is that it imposes restrictions on a kinematical level for states that, on the dynamical level, we would not know exactly how to handle [7,18]: if mass enters in the Schr¨odinger equation as a kinematical (rather than dynamical) variable, how can one cons…”
BackgroundInfluentialStates, Symmetries and Superselection
Giulini, D. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-46657-6_7 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationMass Operator and Dynamical Implementation of Mass Superselection Rule
Annigoni, E., & Moretti, V. (2012) · Annales Henri Poincaré · doi:10.1007/s00023-012-0197-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Giulini [5] has stressed that Bargmann rule has a not well-defined status (comparing with other superselection rules).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHurley, D. J., & Vandyck, M. A. (2010) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-010-9509-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“14) is in agreement with its accepted form [6, 10].”
BackgroundSchnabel, R. (2025) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01028-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Note that the (Bargmann) mass-superselection rule does not apply, because the masses of the particles are no dynamical variables [18].”
Großardt, A. (2022) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271822420172 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Finite size universe or perfect squash problem
Turko, L. (2004) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1782671 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Quantum Clocks in General Relativity
Zych, M. (2017) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53192-2_3
Classical Clocks in General Relativity
Zych, M. (2017) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53192-2_2
Enlargement of Symmetry Groups in Physics: A Practitioner’s Guide
Csillag, L., da Silva, J. M. H., & Pătuleanu, T. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10120448
Testing the weak equivalence principle for nonclassical matter with torsion balances
Onofrio, R., Smith, A. R. H., & Viola, L. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/r2ts-fsjj
“…issues, as it implies the possibility of superposition of mass eigenstates, which (thus far) we have no experimental evidence for, and which complicates the dynamics already at the nonrelativistic level [30], due to the presence of the mass in the kinetic energy term of the Schr ¨ odinger equation.”
- Authors
- Giulini, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Giulini, Domenico
- ORCID
- Giulini, Domenico
- Venue
- Annals of Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 249
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 222-235
- ISSN
- 0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974221830
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annals of Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
- Keywords
- Galilean invariance, Galilei group, superselection rules, interaction energy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review