The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A standard test for AGCMs including their physical parametrizations: I: the proposal
Open accessAbstract
To assist model intercomparison and development of a set of eight numerical experiments is proposed as a test‐bed for the interaction of dynamics and physical parameterizations in atmospheric GCMs. The framework for the experiments is that of an aqua‐planet and the prescribed sea‐surface temperatures (SSTs) are highly idealized. Copyright © 2001 Royal Meteorological Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wheeler, M., & Kiladis, G. N. (1999) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0374:ccewao>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,809
AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project
Gates, W. L. (1992) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<1962:atamip>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,124
A Proposal for the Intercomparison of the Dynamical Cores of Atmospheric General Circulation Models
Held, I. M., & Suarez, M. J. (1994) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<1825:apftio>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 908
AN AMS CONTINUING SERIES: GLOBAL CHANGE--AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project
Gates, W. L. (1992) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · Cited by 744
The 30-40 Day Oscillations Simulated in an "Aqua Planet" Model
Hayashi, Y.-Y., & Sumi, A. (1986) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II · doi:10.2151/jmsj1965.64.4_451 · Cited by 212
The Met. Office – fit for the 21st Century?
Ewins, P. D. (2000) · Atmospheric Science Letters · doi:10.1006/asle.2000.0020 · Cited by 68
Numerical Simulations of the Madden and Julian Oscillation
Swinbank, R., Palmer, T. N., & Davey, M. K. (1988) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · Cited by 49
Wang (1980) · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037
Cited by
The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate configurations
The HadGEM2 Development Team: G. M. Martin, Bellouin, N., Collins, W. J., Culverwell, I. D., Halloran, P. R., Hardiman, S. C., Hinton, T. J., Jones, C. D., McDonald, R. E., McLaren, A. J., et al. (2011) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-4-723-2011 · Cited by 934
Kang, S. M., Held, I. M., Frierson, D. M. W., & Zhao, M. (2008) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli2146.1 · Cited by 667
The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP6
Webb, M. J., Andrews, T., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Bony, S., Bretherton, C. S., Chadwick, R., Chepfer, H., Douville, H., Good, P., Kay, J. E., et al. (2017) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-10-359-2017 · Cited by 309
The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 3.0/3.1 and JULES Global Land 3.0/3.1 configurations
Walters, D. N., Best, M. J., Bushell, A. C., Copsey, D., Edwards, J. M., Falloon, P. D., Harris, C. M., Lock, A. P., Manners, J. C., Morcrette, C. J., et al. (2011) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-4-919-2011 · Cited by 284
Yuval, J., & O’Gorman, P. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17142-3 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Neale, R. B., & Hoskins, B. J.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Science Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-107
- ISSN
- 1530-261X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996364217
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A standard test for AGCMs including their physical parametrizations: I: the proposal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/asle.2000.0022
- The paper
- Neale, R. B., & Hoskins, B. J. (2000). A standard test for AGCMs including their physical parametrizations: I: the proposal. Atmospheric Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.1006/asle.2000.0022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
