Alteration of Transcription Factor mRNAs during the Isolation and Culture of Rat Hepatocytes Suggests the Activation of a Proliferative Mode Underlies Their Dedifferentiation
Abstract
The commonly observed loss of liver specific phenotype regularly described in rat hepatocyte culture is typified by the loss of total cytochrome P450 (CYP) content and the altered abundance of CYP mRNAs. The current work shows that these changes are preceded by the induction of the mRNA encoding the transcription factor c-jun during the hepatocyte isolation procedure. Then as the hepatocytes attach to the substratum the induced expression of c-jun subsides and two patterns of CYP mRNA loss are observed. The mRNAs encoding CYPs 2C11, 2C13, 2E1, 3A1, 3A2 and 4A1 continuously decline while CYP 1A2, 2A1/2 and 2B1/2 mRNAs are temporarily stabilised for 2 to 2.5 hours at a reduced level before declining further. The loss of CYP1A2 and 2B1/2 mRNAs parallels the loss of the mRNAs encoding the liver specific transcription factors C/EBP alpha and HNF-1. The early and rapid increase in c-jun mRNA followed by a decline in C/EBP alpha mRNA are characteristic of the changes in the expression of these transcription factor mRNAs following the stimulation of hepatocyte proliferation after partial hepatectomy. The finding that the rate of loss of total P450 following partial hepatectomy parallels that in rat hepatocyte culture suggests that the commonly employed hepatocyte isolation procedure "primes" the normally quiescent hepatocytes to enter the cell cycle and de-differentiate especially as both systems lose the major constitutively expressed CYP2C11 isozyme.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The results corroborate previous reports showing the importance of HNF1α alongside HNF1β, C/EBP and FOXA1 in dedifferentiation.
“The results corroborate previous reports showing the importance of HNF1α alongside HNF1β, C/EBP and FOXA1 in dedifferentiation (Padgham et al. 1993).”
From Mechanistic evaluation of primary human hepatocyte culture using global proteomic analysis reveals a selective dedifferentiation profile (2017) · cites this paper as Padgham et al. 1993
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 69
- Authors
- Padgham, C. R. W., Boyle, C. C., Wang, X. J., Raleigh, S. M., Wright, M. C., & Paine, A. J.
- Affiliations
- St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 197
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 599-605
- ISSN
- 0006-291X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049001252
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- hepatocyte dedifferentiation, hepatocyte culture, c-Jun, C/EBPα, HNF1, hepatocyte proliferation, partial hepatectomy, CYP2C11, CYP1A2, CYP2B1/2, hepatocyte isolation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Division, Cells, Cultured, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, DNA-Binding Proteins, Hepatectomy, Kinetics, Liver, Male, Nuclear Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Transcription Factors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-jun, CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins, Culture Techniques, Rats, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alpha, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-beta
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review