Cited by 69Liver physiology and pathologyDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Alteration of Transcription Factor mRNAs during the Isolation and Culture of Rat Hepatocytes Suggests the Activation of a Proliferative Mode Underlies Their Dedifferentiation

Padgham, C.R.W., Boyle, C.C., Wang, X.J., Raleigh, S.M., Wright, M.C., Paine, A.J.·1993·Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Abstract

The commonly observed loss of liver specific phenotype regularly described in rat hepatocyte culture is typified by the loss of total cytochrome P450 (CYP) content and the altered abundance of CYP mRNAs. The current work shows that these changes are preceded by the induction of the mRNA encoding the transcription factor c-jun during the hepatocyte isolation procedure. Then as the hepatocytes attach to the substratum the induced expression of c-jun subsides and two patterns of CYP mRNA loss are observed. The mRNAs encoding CYPs 2C11, 2C13, 2E1, 3A1, 3A2 and 4A1 continuously decline while CYP 1A2, 2A1/2 and 2B1/2 mRNAs are temporarily stabilised for 2 to 2.5 hours at a reduced level before declining further. The loss of CYP1A2 and 2B1/2 mRNAs parallels the loss of the mRNAs encoding the liver specific transcription factors C/EBP alpha and HNF-1. The early and rapid increase in c-jun mRNA followed by a decline in C/EBP alpha mRNA are characteristic of the changes in the expression of these transcription factor mRNAs following the stimulation of hepatocyte proliferation after partial hepatectomy. The finding that the rate of loss of total P450 following partial hepatectomy parallels that in rat hepatocyte culture suggests that the commonly employed hepatocyte isolation procedure "primes" the normally quiescent hepatocytes to enter the cell cycle and de-differentiate especially as both systems lose the major constitutively expressed CYP2C11 isozyme.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2521

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 69

Authors
Padgham, C. R. W., Boyle, C. C., Wang, X. J., Raleigh, S. M., Wright, M. C., & Paine, A. J.
Affiliations
St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
Venue
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-12
Volume
197
Issue
2
Pages
599-605
ISSN
0006-291X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049001252
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
hepatocyte dedifferentiation, hepatocyte culture, c-Jun, C/EBPα, HNF1, hepatocyte proliferation, partial hepatectomy, CYP2C11, CYP1A2, CYP2B1/2, hepatocyte isolation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Division, Cells, Cultured, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, DNA-Binding Proteins, Hepatectomy, Kinetics, Liver, Male, Nuclear Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Transcription Factors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-jun, CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins, Culture Techniques, Rats, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alpha, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review