Cited by 216Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsCell Adhesion Molecules Research

Analysis of Cell Mechanics in Single Vinculin-Deficient Cells Using a Magnetic Tweezer

Alenghat, Francis J., Fabry, Ben, Tsai, Kenneth Y., Goldmann, Wolfgang H., Ingber, Donald E.·2000·Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Abstract

A magnetic tweezer was constructed to apply controlled tensional forces (10 pN to greater than 1 nN) to transmembrane receptors via bound ligand-coated microbeadswhile optically measuring lateral bead displacements within individual cells. Use of this system with wild-type F9 embryonic carcinoma cells and cells from a vinculin knockout mouse F9 Vin (-/-) revealed much larger differences in the stiffness of the transmembrane integrin linkages to the cytoskeleton than previously reported using related techniques that measured average mechanical properties of large cell populations. The mechanical properties measured varied widely among cells, exhibiting an approximately log-normal distribution. The median lateral bead displacement was 2-fold larger in F9 Vin (-/-) cells compared to wild-type cells whereas the arithmetic mean displacement only increased by 37%. We conclude that vinculin serves a greater mechanical role in cells than previously reported and that this magnetic tweezer device may be useful for probing the molecular basis of cell mechanics within single cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3636

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alenghat, F. J., Fabry, B., Tsai, K. Y., Goldmann, W. H., & Ingber, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ingber, Donald E.
Venue
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-10
Volume
277
Issue
1
Pages
93-99
ISSN
0006-291X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982406314
Cited by
216
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Keywords
cell mechanics, vinculin, magnetic tweezers, cell stiffness, single-cell mechanical properties
MeSH terms
Animals, Calibration, Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Cytoskeleton, Magnetics, Microspheres, Receptors, Cell Surface, Stress, Mechanical, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Integrins, Vinculin, Mice, Knockout, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review