Comparisons of tumor suppressor p53, p21, and p16 gene therapy effects on glioblastoma tumorigenicity in situ
Abstract
The mutation and/or deletion of tumor suppressor genes have been postulated to play a major role in the genesis and the progression of gliomas. In this study, the functional expression and efficacy in tumor suppression of 3 tumor suppressor genes (p53, p21, and p16) were tested and compared in a rat GBM cell line (RT-2) after retrovirus mediated gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. Significant reductions in tumor cell growth rate were found in p16 and p21 infected cells (60 +/- 12% vs 66 +/- 15%) compared to p53 (35 +/- 9%). In vitro colony formation assay also showed significant reductions after p16 and p21 gene delivery (98 +/- 5% vs 91 +/- 10%) compared to p53 (50 +/- 18%). In addition, the tumor suppression efficacy were investigated and compared in vivo. Retroviral mediated p16 and p21 gene deliveries in glioblastomas resulted in more than 90% reductions in tumor growth (92 +/- 26% vs 90 +/- 22%) compared to p53 (62 +/- 18%). Tumor suppressor gene insertions in situ further prolonged animal survival. Overall p16 and p21 genes showed more powerful tumor suppressor effects than p53. The results were not surprising, as p16 and p21 are more downstream in the cell cycle regulatory pathway compared to p53. Moreover, the mechanism involved in each of their suppressor effects is different. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using tumor suppressor genes in regulating the growth of glioma in vitro and in situ.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The p53-ARF-MDM2 pathway is deregulated in 84% of glioblastoma patients and in up to 94.1% of glioblastoma cell lines.
“The p53-ARF-MDM2 pathway is deregulated in 84% of glioblastoma (GBM) patients and 94% of GBM cell lines.”
From The p53 Pathway in Glioblastoma (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Wang, T.-J., Huang, M.-S., Hong, C.-Y., Tse, V., Silverberg, G. D., & Hsiao, M.
- Affiliations
- Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
- Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Hsiao, Michael
- Venue
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 173-180
- ISSN
- 0006-291X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104919376
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education (89-B-FA08-1-4)
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRP1248)
- National Science Council (NSC90-2314-B-037-129, NSC90-NU-7-075B-001)
- Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (VGHKS90-08)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Keywords
- glioblastoma, tumor suppressor, p53, p21, p16, gene therapy, retroviral gene transfer, tumor suppression, tumor growth inhibition, cell cycle regulation, animal survival
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Division, Disease Models, Animal, Genetic Vectors, Glioblastoma, Humans, Neoplasm Transplantation, Retroviridae, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Tumor Stem Cell Assay, Carcinogenicity Tests, Genetic Therapy, Gene Expression, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cyclins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Gene Transfer Techniques, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review