The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota
Abstract
Population structure is the result of both present processes and past history. Molecular markers are proving of great value in describing the former, and it is important to similarly determine the latter in order to understand their respective contributions. The study of palaeo-climates has also advanced significantly, and in particular that of the Pleistocene ice ages, which modified species ranges considerably. The last ice age and rapid post-glacial colonization of Europe is summarized. Possible population genetic consequences of expansion northward from southern refugia, and those of remaining in these mountainous regions are discussed. A series of recent case studies are detailed where DNA sequence information has been used to describe species genetic variation and subdivision across Europe. These include a grasshopper, the hedgehog, oak trees, the common beech, the black alder, the brown bear, newts, shrews, water vole, silver fir and house mice. These molecular data confirm southern peninsulas of Europe as major ice age refugia, and in most cases demonstrate that genetically distinct taxa emerged from them. They can thus define genomic differences and so gready augment previous fossil data. The refugial genomes contributed differently in various species to die re-colonization of Europe, with three broad patterns described as paradigms–‘grasshopper’, ‘hedgehog’ and ‘bear’. These different expansion patterns produced clusters of hybrid zones where they made contact, and it is argued that many species genomes may be further cryptically subdivided. A reduction in diversity from southern to northern Europe in the extent of allelic variation and species subdivision is seen; this is attributed to rapid expansion northward and the varied topography of southern refugia allowing populations to diverge through several ice ages. The differences in DNA sequence indicate that some species have been diverging in refugial regions for a few ice ages at most, whilst distinct lineages in other species suggest much more ancient separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SKREDE, I., EIDESEN, P. B., PORTELA, R. P., & BROCHMANN, C. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02908.x · Cited by 2,746
Wisz, M. S., Pottier, J., Kissling, W. D., Pellissier, L., Lenoir, J., Damgaard, C. F., Dormann, C. F., Forchhammer, M. C., Grytnes, J., Guisan, A., et al. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00235.x · Cited by 1,769
Refugia revisited: individualistic responses of species in space and time
Stewart, J. R., Lister, A. M., Barnes, I., & Dalén, L. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1272 · Cited by 1,255
Parnell, A. C., Haslett, J., Allen, J. R. M., Buck, C. E., & Huntley, B. (2008) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.07.009 · Cited by 420
Using phylogeographic analyses of gene trees to test species status and processes
Templeton, A. R. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01199.x · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Hewitt, G. M.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 87-112
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002198462
- Cited by
- 2,986
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/bijl.1999.0332
- The paper
- Hewitt, G. M. (1999). Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1999.0332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.